Quantcast
Channel: Exposing Islam.
Viewing all 3867 articles
Browse latest View live

Student who tweeted that people wearing Help for Heroes shirt 'deserve to be beheaded' sentenced to community service over vile jibe

$
0
0
Deyka Ayan Hassan, 21, contacted officers after receiving hundreds of vitriolic responses to the message on May 22, including threats to rape her and kill her by burning down her home, Hendon Magistrates' Court heard.

But she was herself later arrested at home after admitting to police she had tweeted 'to be honest, if you wear a Help for Heroes t-shirt you deserve to be beheaded' as a 'joke' about the design of the item of clothing.

The English and politics undergraduate at Kingston University, who lives in Harrow, north west London, was ordered to do 250 hours of unpaid work by magistrates today, having admitted a charge of sending a malicious electronic message at an earlier hearing.

Chairman of the bench Nigel Orton told her she could have been jailed for what she did but that magistrates accepted she hadn’t known it was a soldier who had been killed when she posted it.

'The tragic events in Woolwich that day have created a context which made this tweet appear extreme,' he said.

'It had a huge impact and clearly caused offence and distress. We accept you didn’t intend to cause harm and you felt it was a joke.

Hassan, who was escorted to court with relatives and friends, meant her comment to be a jokey criticism of the design of the t-shirt worn by supporters of the forces charity, magistrates heard
Hassan, who was escorted to court with relatives and friends, meant her comment to be a jokey criticism of the design of the t-shirt worn by supporters of the forces charity, magistrates heard
Hassan, who was escorted to court with relatives and friends, meant her comment to be a jokey criticism of the design of the t-shirt worn by supporters of the forces charity, magistrates heard

'Your act was naive and foolish and without regard to the general public at a time of heightened sensitivity.'

The court heard that Hassan’s father works in Somalia for charities including US Aid and Prevent, combating extremism.

Magistrates accepted she hadn¿t known it was a soldier who had been killed when she posted her comment
Magistrates accepted she hadn¿t known it was a soldier who had been killed when she posted her comment
He is also a former 'associate advisor for policing diversity' to the Metropolitan Police.

Hassan sat with her head bowed throughout this afternoon’s hearing.

The magistrates heard that she tweeted the message at around 4pm on May 22, just hours after Drummer Rigby was brutally hacked to death in south east London.

At that time, various rumours were circulating via social media about the manner of the soldier’s killing, including that he had been decapitated.

Magistrates were told that she tweeted the message to her 600 followers after seeing other people making remarks about the case and wanting to join in.

She meant it to be a jokey criticism of the design of the t-shirt worn by supporters of the forces charity, the court heard.

But after being alerted by friends Hassan found the message has sparked angry replies, including some saying she deserved to be raped or killed.

She immediately closed down her Twitter and Facebook accounts and then went to the local police station, where she was interviewed before being arrested for the original tweet.

Katie Weiss, prosecuting, said: 'She said she was making a joke about the design of the (HfH) t-shirt.

'She said it was a comment she would (typically) make about clothes and shoes she didn’t like.

Itpal Dhillon, defending, said Hassan admitted that what she wrote had caused 'gross offence' and she was disgusted with herself, having been brought up to be tolerant and respect society.


'At the time she did not know the full details relating to the horrific incident,' Ms Dhillon said.
'She certainly didn’t know that the man who was killed was a soldier and the killing may be motivated by extremist beliefs or values.

'She accepts it (the tweet) was distasteful and disgusting.'

Ms Dhillon said her client, works in a shoe shop alongside her studies. She also volunteers with charities including Crisis at Christmas and a local Somali community group.

She had not intended any 'racist undertone' to the message, Ms Dhillon said.


Lauren Booth, Tony Blair’s sister-in-law turned obese Muslim convert, steps out with her new Muslim husband as wife #2

$
0
0

He, though, is said to be still legally wed under British law to Faiza Ahmed, his wife of 16 years. Mrs Ahmed has accused Miss Booth of stealing her husband after being invited into their home as a guest and dishonouring her new religion with brash, flirty behaviour.

Outweighing her new husband by a lot, thankfully her body was totally concealed in a strange combination of Muslim garb and baglady chic.

Miss Booth and Mr Ahmed were seen stepping out together in Hampstead Garden Suburb, North London, where she lives in a£500,000apartment with her two daughters.

Mr Ahmed’s first wife is now looking after their three sons in Texas after she left the family home in Greater Manchester to stay with her brother. The 37-year-old is separated from her husband, but says they have not divorced.

She said: ‘Lauren destroyed my home. You can’t just put  on a hijab and say you are a good Muslim woman – it’s about having boundaries with men, and love and respect for women.’ Mrs Ahmed claims her husband married Miss Booth in a secret nikah, or religious ceremony, which she only found out about in February when her husband called her to ask for a divorce. 

Faiza Ahmed is still legally married to Sohale Ahmed under British law
Faiza Ahmed is still legally married to Sohale Ahmed under British law

Islamic law states that Muslim men can marry four women. While a nikah is significant religiously, it is not recognised as legal marriage in Britain unless the couple have also registered at a UK Register Office.

 Miss Booth was formerly married to actor Craig Darby, with whom she had two daughters.

They divorced after he suffered brain injuries in a motorbike crash. 

In October 2010, she announced she was converting to Islam, saying she was drawn to the religion because of ‘an appreciation of Muslim culture, in particular that of Muslim women.’ Not to mention a close personal bond with the leader of Hamas.

Article 5

BBC Claims “Antisemitism” Too Long a Word, “Islamophobia” Just Right

$
0
0
Finding the right words can be tasking. Even when you’re the BBC and your grotesquely inflated salaries are paid by a mandatory fee just so you can spew out programming that no one in their right mind watches anymore, it’s still a trial to find the find the right way of telling the people what they should think.
The BBC recently reported the story of the Labour Lord who was suspended for claiming that Jews were responsible for his imprisonment after driving offences.
The Labour peer was jailed for sending a text message shortly before his car was involved in a fatal crash. He later said that Jewish owners of “newspapers and TV channels” had put pressure on the court.
Many queried the BBC’s reporting of the incident at the time. In fact, the odd headline, “Labour peer Lord Ahmed suspended after ‘Jewish claims’” is still currently live. Instead of using “anti-Semitism”, the Beeb opted for “Jewish claims”, making the story seem like there were claims by Jewish people leading to Lord Ahmed’s suspension.
But the BBC had a good excuse. A perfectly reasonable explanation.
BBC: Thanks for your email and please accept our apologies for the delay in replying. We try and stick as closely as possible to the words used, so, in this case we  used ‘Jewish claims’ in the short space available for headlines to summarise his comments.
READER: Thanks for your reply, but with all due respect that is utter nonsense. ‘Jewish claims’ 13 characters. ‘Antisemitism’ 12 characters. Plus one look at the space available in the headline within the URL will tell you that there is/was PLENTY of space to report factually
Even more oddly, Islamophobia is also 12 characters yet the BBC has no trouble fitting it into every conceivable manner of headline including, “Islamophobia ‘explosion’ in UK”, “‘Islamophobia’ rises after 11 September”, “UK press ‘fuels Islamophobia”, “Islamophobia ‘just getting worse’”, “Terror jury Islamophobia warning” and finally “Islamophobia since Islam began”.
The word magicians at the BBC appear to have contrived ways to fit Islamophobia’s 12 character bulk into a headline, but can’t figure out how to get anti-Semitism in there.

Muslim hate monitor to lose backing

$
0
0

Ministers end funding for body that claimed 'wave of attacks’ against Islam.

Fiyaz Mughal of Tell Mama.
Fiyaz Mughal of Tell Mama. Photo: REX FEATURES
A controversial project claiming to measure anti-Muslim attacks will not have its government grant renewed after police and civil servants raised concerns about its methods.
The project, called Tell Mama, claimed that there had been a “sustained wave of attacks and intimidation” against British Muslims after the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby, with 193 “Islamophobic incidents” reported to it, rising to 212 by last weekend.
The group’s founder, Fiyaz Mughal, said he saw “no end to this cycle of violence”, describing it as “unprecedented”. The claims were unquestioningly repeated in the media.
Tell Mama and Mr Mughal did not mention, however, that 57 per cent of the 212 reports referred to activity that took place only online, mainly offensive postings on Twitter and Facebook, or that a further 16 per cent of the 212 reports had not been verified. Not all the online abuse even originated in Britain.
Contrary to the group’s claim of a “cycle of violence” and a “sustained wave of attacks”, only 17 of the 212 incidents, 8 per cent, involved the physical targeting of people and there were no attacks on anyone serious enough to require medical treatment.
There have been a further 12 attacks on Islamic buildings, three of them serious, including a probable arson attack on a Muslim community centre in north London, which burned it to the ground.
Tell Mama supporters launched a furious campaign of protest againstThe Sunday Telegraph after it disclosed the breakdown last week, with round-robin emails to the newspaper accusing it of behaviour “better suited to the days of 1930s Germany”.
However, The Sunday Telegraph has now learned that even before Woolwich, the communities minister, the Liberal Democrat MP Don Foster, called Mr Mughal to a meeting and said that Tell Mama’s grant would not be renewed.
The organisation has received a total of £375,000 from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) since last year.
“Mr Mughal was giving data on attacks to DCLG which wasn’t stacking up when it was cross-referenced with other reports by Acpo [the Association of Chief Police Officers],” said one source closely involved in counter-extremism.
“He was questioned by DCLG civil servants and lost his temper. He was subsequently called in by Don Foster and told that he would receive no more money.”
A senior Liberal Democrat source confirmed the sequence of events, saying: “There was a bit of a spat. He was called in and told that Acpo had cast doubt on his figures. He was told that he would be closely monitored for the remaining period of the grant and that there would be no more money.”
A DCLG spokesman confirmed that Tell Mama’s funding would not be renewed and refused to deny that officials had raised concerns about its methods.
Tell Mama claimed in March that anti-Muslim crime was “rising”, even though the group had only been in operation at that stage for a year and had no previous figures to compare with.
Other figures, collected by the police, show that hate crime in mainly Muslim areas has fallen in the past 10 years. 
The only large force that collects figures on specifically anti-Muslim crime, the Metropolitan Police, reported an 8.5 per cent fall in such crimes between 2009 and 2012.
There was a spike in anti-Muslim incidents after the killing of Drummer Rigby. However, contrary to Tell Mama’s claims that it was “unprecedented”, the Met’s assistant commissioner, Cressida Dick, told MPs last week that it was “slightly less” than after previous terror attacks.
“There has not been such a very big increase in attacks as we might have feared,” she said. Mr Mughal himself has now admitted to the BBC that the number of physical attacks was “small”.
Tell Mama has also been using its budget to threaten members of the public with libel actions for criticising it on Twitter.
In mid-May, before Woolwich, one Jewish activist, Ambrosine Chetrit, received a threatening letter from solicitors after she tweeted that “Tell Mama are sitting on Twitter on the EDL hashtag, threatening anyone and everyone whose comments they do not like about Islam”.
Tell Mama also objected to a tweet in which Ms Chetrit said it was “trying to close down pro-Israel [Twitter] accounts daily”.
Other recipients of legal threats at the same time include Atma Singh, a former race adviser to the then Labour mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, who received a legal letter from Tell Mama after tweeting that it “gives a platform to Islamists”.
Tell Mama did not claim that either of these individuals was racist or anti-Muslim. But it said their tweets were false and “defamatory” of Mr Mughal, had “damaged” his reputation, causing him “distress and embarrassment”, and demanded immediate apologies and damages. Up to four other people are believed to have received similar threats.
The letters were written by Farooq Bajwa, a solicitor who has acted for a number of Islamists and Islamist sympathisers, including the Palestinian radical leader Raed Salah and the Respect MP George Galloway.
The letters to Mr Singh and Ms Chetrit were sent to their private home addresses, neither of which are in the public domain. Ms Chetrit’s lawyer, Mark Lewis, who has acted for many phone-hacking victims, has reported Mr Bajwa and Tell Mama to the police after they refused to say how they obtained the information.
“I have been instructed to resist the claim,” said Mr Lewis. “It has no merit. I have not had any response as to how my client’s name and address were obtained.”
Mr Singh said: “I find it absurd that someone can threaten people on this kind of basis and use libel in this political way. This is nothing to do with Islamophobia – they are just trying to shut down debate.”
Ms Chetrit said: “It is very worrying and scary. All the people who have been threatened by Tell Mama are pro-Israeli.”
The DCLG claimed that Tell Mama’s funding was always due to cease in September 2013 and that Mr Foster was “very impressed” by the “progress” the group had made.
However, the funding of Tell Mama was described as “ongoing” in the Government’s “hate crime action plan” last year and only in November Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, announced that £214,000 of “new” and “further” funding had been granted to Tell Mama.
Mr Mughal said: “The meeting with DCLG officials related to the publication of 2012 anti-Muslim prejudice figures and having an independent review of those figures, which is good practice.
"This was agreed and has always been part of the process. The 'loss of temper’ did not relate to the methodology of data collection.”
Mr Mughal said that no public money had been used to issue the libel threats.
He said: “We will defend the right of all people to express their identities and their support for countries and groups freely.
However, we have the right to defend the integrity of our work when people broadcast [on Twitter] comments that are simply untrue and highly damaging about us.”
He declined to explain how the private addresses had been obtained, but said it was “within the law.”

about bloody time too

$
0
0
The family of a grandfather convicted of attempting to recruit two undercover police officers for jihad in Afghanistan face losing their £200,000 home under anti-terrorism laws.

Former Taliban fighter Munir Farooqi, 56, was given four life sentences in September 2011 for running a 'recruitment centre' for home-grown extremists to go to Afghanistan to kill British troops.

His family have now spoken of their 'torture' as they face being made homeless and penniless if he loses his High Court appeal next month against his conviction for soliciting to murder and disseminating terrorist literature.

Munir Farooqi's family face being thrown out of their home in Longsight, Manchester, if the grandfather fails in his High Court appeal against his conviction
Munir Farooqi's family face being thrown out of their home in Longsight, Manchester, if the grandfather fails in his High Court appeal against his conviction

The house in Longsight, Manchester, is home to three generations of the Farooqi family, including two children, according to The Independent.

The family were served with a notice by the Crown Prosecution Service's Proceeds of Crime Unit at the end of the trial, stating it intended to seize the house under Section 23a of the Terrorism Act. The judge in the case ordered the proceedings to be halted until the outcome of the appeal.

Supporters of the family, who have committed no offence in their own right, say they are being punished for the actions of another.
 
Munir Farooqi's son Harris, 29, a market trader who was cleared of terror charges at the 2011 trial, said eight people lived at the home, owned by his sister and mother.

He told The Independent: 'How can they demonise a whole family? It is sickening.

'You have to be insane deliberately to make a family go through such torture and to claim they are all terrorists.'

Munir Farooqi, 56, attempted to recruit two undercover police officers for jihad
Munir Farooqi's family face being evicted out of their £200,000 home
Jailed: Munir Farooqi, 56, attempted to recruit two undercover police officers for jihad. His family have now spoken of their 'torture' as they face being made homeless

Supporters of the family, who have committed no offence in their own right, say they are being punished for the actions of another
Supporters of the family, who have committed no offence in their own right, say they are being punished for the actions of another

The property could be seized under anti-terrorism laws because the court found attempts took place there to radicalise men and persuade them to take part in jihad.

The family told the paper they are confident their father, who was ordered to serve a minimum of nine years, will win his appeal and that the undercover police investigation was unlawful.

THE TERRORISM ACT AND THE RIGHT TO SEIZE THE ASSETS OF A CONVICTED TERRORIST

Under Clause 23a of the Terrorism Act 2000 a convicted terrorist can have their assets seized by the state under a forfeiture order.
The Crown Prosecution Service's Proceeds of Crime Unit served the Farooqi family with a notice of its intention to make an application for the forfeiture of the house at the end of Munir Farooqi's trial.
The attempted seizure comes as the courts found Farooqi attempted to radicalise men and recruit them for jihad at the house.
The judge in the case ordered the seizure proceedings to take place after the outcome of Farooqi's appeal.
His outraged family say they are entitled to a private and family life and will use the Human Rights Act to fight the move.
Their solicitor Simon Pook said the act had been misinterpreted and could create case law which would be in breach of the European Convention of Human Rights.
The CPS has said the power to forfeit residential premises in these circumstances is a new power under the Counter Terrorism Act 2008.
The family's solicitor Simon Pook said the act had been misinterpreted and could create case law which would be in breach of the European Convention of Human Rights. 

Nearly 20,000 people have signed a petition demanding the seizure of the house be stopped.

During his trial, Manchester Crown Court heard how Farooqi was at the centre of a plot to radicalise and persuade vulnerable young men to 'fight, kill and die'.

Over a two year period Farooqi - who boasted of being a jihadist and was detained in Afghanistan in 2001- tried to persuade people visiting his stall to travel to training camps in Afghanistan.

He was arrested in November 2009 after two white undercover policemen infiltrated the recruiting school and underwent radicalisation ceremonies in the basement of his terraced home.

During the undercover investigation one of the detectives taped Farooqi boasting: ‘If we die, we win. You have Allah on your side, how can we lose?

‘You know Jihad is not about you giving your life away. If we’re going to go there you make sure you take at least 40 or 50 people with us so we’ve done something.’

In September 2011 Farooqi was convicted of three charges of soliciting murder, preparing for acts of terrorism and distributing terrorist publications after a four month trial. He was jailed for a minimum of nine years.

A CPS spokesman said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service is making an application under S23a of the Terrorism Act 2000 for the forfeiture of Munir Farooqi’s home... on the basis that it has been used for the purposes of terrorism. 

'The power to forfeit residential premises in these circumstances is a new power under the Counter Terrorism Act 2008, and before any decision is made, the forfeiture application is considered by the court and the family will be given an opportunity to be heard. 

'The court will consider the effect of any order on the family members.'


London-based Muslim TV channel rebroadcasts show on wife-beating to European audiences in French, English and Arabic

$
0
0

This show was first broadcast in 2002 and has been widely circulated since then.
 But instead of being embarrassed by it and repudiating it, the London-based Iqra TV channel rebroadcast it in April. 
No doubt, however, it will continue to be assumed to be "moderate."

Tensions high in British town after Muslim youths attack non-Muslim girls

$
0
0

"This is becoming a regular occurence on the streets of the UK." But it is not, no matter now many times the British media (including the generally reliable Commentator) insist that it is, a racial issue. It is an issue of a violent and supremacist belief-system.
"Tensions high in British town after 'Muslim youths' attack 'white girls,'" from The Commentator, June 12:
Tensions are running high in the northern English town of Ashton-under-Lyne after a video circulating online showed a gang of what is reported as British-Pakistani youths attacking young "white girls" at a bus stop.
The incident, which occured in the town just outside of Manchester, has led to a number of groups calling for a 'march' or 'rally' in the town this coming Saturday, with the English Defence League quickly setting up an 'Ashton-Under-Lyne' branch of the group.
The video, which has been removed from YouTube but can still be found on LiveLeak, describes the incident last night as, "This is a video that has been taken in Ashton Under Lyne, England that shows a gang of Muslim youths attacking a group of white kids. Just before the filming had started one of the muslim youths had punched one of the white girls in the face. This is becoming a regular occurence on the streets of the UK."
While there have been reports of arrests after last night's incident, Tameside Police are yet to confirm this to The Commentator, though police services for the local area have said that they have received, "Lots of messages about the video, it's being investigated arrests are being made. We have no further comments until after the investigation." The force also tweeted that it arrest four people for "minor public order offences" after groups gathered in Ashton town centre last night.
There were also reports of further clashes as a result of the incident, which have been rebuked by local authorities. Tameside Council tweeted last night, "Rumours circulating tonight about alleged fighting in Ashton town centre. These reports are inaccurate, there has been no disorder."
Sources also suggest that police sent a text message out asking parents and guardians to keep their children away from the area, though this is also yet to be confirmed.
The assault, which apparently included cricket bats, and included a young man launching into a flying kick on a girl, is thought to have occured on Monday night.

MUSLIM GANG SHOUTS ABUSE AT YOUNG AIR CADETS AT ARMY BARRACKS

$
0
0
A disgusted father has told how a group of young air cadets were racially abused by a gang who waited outside Preston’s Territorial Army barracks.

Police were called on Tuesday night after one cadet was allegedly chased towards Preston north End’s stadium from Kimberley Barracks on Deepdale Road, following a training session.

On Tuesdays the barracks is used by the 341 Air Squadron, but it is also understood a group of army cadets may have been verbally abused on the same evening.

Today, Det Chf Insp Ian Dawson of Preston Police said there were no security concerns at the barracks and said it was a minor incident.

He said: “ we are aware of a minor incident at the barracks and believe it was isolated. We have close links with the barracks and are working,through our diversity team, to establish who the youths involved are.

“Preston has a diverse community and we are not aware of any problems.

“We are working closely with community leaders.

He added: “We understand the cadets had played football on the park before returning to the barracks.

 A short time later, as they left the barracks, they were shouted at by a group.

“We have assessed our reassurance response to the incident.

A concerned parent, who did not wish to be named, said: “ A group of Asian youths were outside the barracks and were abusing the cadets as they came out.

“One ran back inside and had to get a sergeant’s help.

“Members of the TA who are stationed at the barracks also came out.

“My stepdaughter is in the air cadets and we worry about her walking home as it is.

“The youngsters were advised not to walk home alone.

“My stepdaughter had been shouted at once before as she left the barracks. It does not put us off sending her, but it frightens me.”

Coun Terry Cartwright, who represents the area, said: “ It is disturbing, particularly in the wake of what happened at Woolwich Barracks in London.

These young cadets are trying to make something of themselves.”

Preston community worker Ali Amla said: “ It is totally unacceptable behaviour for these young people to have been treated like that.

“The cadets are there to volunteer their time very positively and do something very positive in the community.”

A spokesman for Fulwood Barracks confirmed the air cadets had been training in the barracks at the time.
An Air Cadet spokesman was not available for comment. 

"He said: “ we are aware of a minor incident at the barracks and believe it was isolated. We have close links with the barracks and are working,through our diversity team, to establish who the youths involved are."
Along with the rest of his statements, I've never read a more dhimwitted version of reality than that.

"Allah will punish you all!" Muslim attacks other Muslims with machete in UK mosque for not praying properly

$
0
0
A Somali Muslim allegedly stabbed a policeman and three mosque worshippers after screaming: ‘Allah is going to punish you all.’
The 32-year-old is said to have tried to kill the worshippers during an argument over whether they were praying correctly.
It is thought the man, who was not a regular at the mosque in Birmingham, became upset because the prayers were not being performed in the manner of his denomination.
One witness, who asked not to be named, said: ‘I heard shouting behind me as I was praying. I turned around and saw two men grappling with each other.
‘Suddenly a man pulled out a knife and stabbed the other man in the leg, near the groin.
'Someone tried to intervene but the man just went for him and thrust a knife into his abdomen. It was absolutely terrifying.’

Minutes later two police officers, one male and one female, arrived at the Madrasah Qasim-ul-Uloom mosque in Ward End and the man allegedly ran at them with a large combat knife.
Despite the male officer shooting him with a Taser, the man is said to have stabbed him in his chest and stomach.
‘The police tried to Taser the man but he didn’t fall down,’ the witness continued. ‘Instead he just lunged at the officer after pulling out his knife again and stabbed him. There was blood everywhere.’
Despite his serious injuries the 31-year-old officer ‘heroically’ overcame the man.
The officer was with his family in hospital yesterday preparing for surgery. Two of the other men were being treated for multiple stab wounds following the attack just after 11pm on Saturday.
An off-duty surgeon who happened to be at prayers fought to keep them alive before paramedics arrived.
Another man, Dr Arshad Mahmood, who had his hand stabbed while trying to disarm the attacker, said: ‘Everyone was frightened. It was so sudden.
‘A man started stabbing one of the guys who was just sitting right next to him.
'We went to save him. He had multiple injuries, three or four wounds.
'A few of us went to stop him. One of the guys was strong enough to stop him. I held his hand. One also had an injury on his thigh.’
Another witness said: ‘He shouted “Allah is going to punish you all”. He stabbed two people then one guy restrained him and someone called the police.’
The suspect was being held yesterday in a mental health facility on suspicion of attempted murder.
The attack comes less than a month after soldier Lee Rigby was murdered in Woolwich, south London, allegedly by knifemen boasting they were avenging the death of Muslims by the military.
The male officer, who has not yet been named, was due to receive a bravery award this week for helping to save the life of a young child in a separate incident last year.
Chief Superintendent Alex Murray, of West Midlands Police, praised the policeman, saying: ‘There was some real brave action going on inside that mosque.’
He added: ‘There’s no connection with any other incidents that we can see at the moment – for example, Woolwich or other incidents around the country.
'There’s no information at this stage to suggest it was a hate crime.’
West Midlands Police would be ‘looking into details’ about why the Taser had no effect on the suspect.
Liam Byrne, MP for Birmingham Hodge Hill, said: ‘This was not a hate crime, this was a tragic, sad, and isolated incident.’
Mohammed Shafiq, of national Muslim organisation the Ramadhan Foundation, said: ‘We must be clear there should be no place for this sort of violence in our country.’

Scots police smash two ‘large’ paedophile rings

$
0
0

SCOTTISH police have smashed two “large scale” child sex networks involving a “significant proportion” of ethnic minority offenders.

Assistant-Chief-Constable-Malcolm-Graham-revealed-the-crackdown-on-child-sex-networks-in-ScotlandAssistant Chief Constable Malcolm Graham revealed the crackdown on child sex networks in Scotland
Further details cannot be disclosed for legal reasons as the cases are still to come to court, however the investigations contain chilling echoes of high- profile prosecutions south of the Border.
In another, utterly appalling example of child abuse, two 13-year-old Scots girls were groomed and raped by a network of “numerous” paedophiles across Britain.
This operation resulted in 37 arrests and the identification of 108 further potential victims and perpetrators. Again, all of those involved are still awaiting trial.
The details of the crackdown were revealed by Assistant Chief Constable Malcolm Graham to a Holyrood inquiry into the scale of child abuse. Concern is growing that the problem has been grossly underestimated for years, with police and prosecutors failing to take victims seriously.
There are groups of foreign nationals involved in this and maybe respect for women isn’t seen as being a high priority in their country of origin
A police source
Senior officers also fear the involvement of ethnic minority offenders in child sexual exploitation (CSE) will lead to “significant community tension”.
Mr Graham said: “In two large scale CSE investigations in Scotland a significant proportion of the identified perpetrators were from ethnic minority communities. It is not possible to draw conclusions from this relatively small dataset and more accurate data and wider research is required.
“It is acknowledged extremist groups have attempted to associate CSE with wider immigration issues and this has the potential for significant unrest.”
However, a police source added: “There are groups of foreign nationals involved in this and maybe respect for women isn’t seen as being a high priority in their country of origin.”
The two Scottish probes follow similar operations in England, which saw members child grooming rings jailed. In particular, cases in Rochdale, Oxford and Telford where Asian and North African men preyed on vulnerable white girls sparked widespread outrage.
Mr Graham, formerly the top murder detective in Edinburgh, said the force was determined to “tackle this emerging threat to Scotland”.
Extra training on how to investigate child abuse has been provided, as well as a seminar where a victim gave an emotional speech to 200 officers.
In addition, a National Vulnerable Persons Database will be rolled out from July to record every child under threat and suspicious adult in Scotland in one place.
Mr Graham also had a chilling message for parents about the “darker side of social media and the internet”.
He said there has been a “significant rise” in young people posting indecent photos of themselves online, known as “selfies” – which often fall into the hands of paedophiles.
The biggest success of the internet crackdown was a “recent operation concerning two 13 year old girls who were groomed, exploited and sexually abused by numerous individuals across the UK. “This operation resulted in 37 arrests across the country.”
The difficulty in establishing the scale of child abuse in Scotland is partly down to the variety of different charges which offenders can face.
The Crown Office has revealed that 350 perverts have been convicted of rape or serious sexual assault of a child under the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 since it came into force in December 2010.
A further 239 people have been cleared while 116 have been reported to the procurator fiscal but faced no further action.
Last month, the Sunday Express exposed the nationwide scandal of ‘party flats’ where young girls are groomed and then raped by older men.

Scottish Police Worry Breakup of 2 Muslim Paedophile Rings Will “Increase Community Tensions”


Man in court over beheading murder

$
0
0
A 20-year-old man has appeared in court charged with the murder of a young woman who was beheaded in a knife attack in Sheffield.
Aras Hussein appeared at Sheffield Magistrates' Court accused of murdering Reema Ramzan, 18.
Miss Ramzan, who was from the Darnall area of Sheffield, died on June 4 following an incident at a property on Herries Road, in the city.
Detectives said she suffered a severe knife attack resulting in fatal injuries, including the severing of her head.
Hussein, of Herries Road, Sheffield, is also charged with assaulting five people at Sheffield's Northern General Hospital, where he was taken following his arrest by police.
He stood in the glass-fronted dock flanked by two uniformed police officers.
Sporting full beard and short, dark hair, he wore a navy blue T-shirt and spoke only to confirm his personal details and that he understood the charge.
Hussein was remanded in custody following a 10-minute hearing and told he will appear again a Sheffield Crown Court on Thursday.
Miss Ramzan's family issued a statement through police on Tuesday.
It said: "Following the death of Reema, a loving and caring daughter and sister, we as a family would like to pass on our heartfelt thanks for all of the messages and support we have received from our extended family, friends, people in the community where we live and especially from the staff and students at Sheffield College.
"These messages and support have given us strength and helped us to try to deal with the nightmare we have found ourselves in. As a family, our thoughts now turn to being able to bury Reema and to let her finally rest in peace."

Contractor loses out on his 'dream'£1,000-a-week IT role after unwittingly saying he would treat his Muslim recruiter to a bacon sandwich

$
0
0
Clive Hunt, 58, says he was offered the IT job by recruitment firm Reed before a senior manager phoned him to say his offer of a bacon sandwich to a recruiter was racistAn IT contractor was accused of racism and refused a £1,000-a-week NHS job after innocently offering to buy an Asian recruitment consultant a bacon sandwich.

Clive Hunt, 58, had already been given the eight-month contract – worth £32,000 – and was invited to recruitment firm Reed’s office in Manchester to show his passport and provide bank details. 

At the end of the 15-minute meeting earlier this month, recruitment consultant Sharika Sacranie, 29, shook Mr Hunt’s hand and said she would come and meet him for breakfast the following week, to which he replied: ‘I’ll get the bacon sandwiches in.’

Clive Hunt, 58, says he was offered the IT job by recruitment firm Reed before a senior manager phoned him to say his offer of a bacon sandwich to a recruiter was racist

Mr Hunt made the comment to Reed recruiter Sharika Sacranie
Mr Hunt made the comment to Reed recruiter Sharika Sacranie
Miss Sacranie – who is believed to be a Muslim – rang Mr Hunt half an hour later to confirm a few more details, making no mention of the incident.

However, just ten minutes later Mr Hunt received another call from a senior manager at Reed accusing him of making a racist comment and saying the job offer had been withdrawn.

Last night, Mr Hunt told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I just can’t believe it. I’m not a racist and I only offered to buy her a bacon sandwich because she said she was coming for breakfast.

 It was an off-the-cuff comment.

‘I was at the top of the stairs ready to leave and Sharika said, “I’ll buy everybody breakfast either Monday or Tuesday next week.” I turned around and said, “I’ll get the bacon sandwiches in.”

‘There’s nothing racist about it. 

There was no slur at her because I’d already met all the contractors on site before and one of them had actually told me they had really good bacon sandwiches.

'I don’t even know whether Sharika is a Muslim or not. I’d never met her before that day but we got on fine.

‘When the manager rang me up to accuse me of making a racist remark, he just kept telling me I should admit to my wrongdoing. 

But eventually I got so exasperated that I told him to “sod off” and put the phone down.’

Clive Hunt says he lost out on a £1,000-a-month NHS contract when a Reed recruiter complained he made a racist remark
Clive Hunt says he lost out on a £1,000-a-month NHS contract when a Reed recruiter complained he made a racist remark

He added: ‘I’ve been out of work for two months so this is a massive blow for me. I was under the impression that the agency was just a middle man.

 How can it rescind an offer that was made to me by the NHS?’

Miss Sacranie could not be reached for comment yesterday. In a statement, Reed said: ‘Due to inappropriate comments made to members of our staff during the recruitment process before Mr Hunt started his new role, we do not feel we can represent this candidate further.’

An NHS spokesperson was unavailable for comment last night.

k

Mother who threw her newborn baby daughter 40ft down rubbish chute at block of flats while suffering from post-natal depression is jailed for two and a half years

$
0
0
Jaymin Abdulrahman, 25, accepted she put her six-day-old baby girl down the chute but told the jury she had not planned the incident and had 'lost control of her thoughts' at the time.

The baby, who cannot be named for legal reasons, miraculously survived but suffered skull fractures and brain injuries after she fell into a bin store at a block of flats in Wolverhampton last September.

Experts estimated the force the impact was the equivalent of being in a 30mph car crash without a seat belt.

Today a jury of seven men and five women found Abdulrahman guilty of inflicting grievous bodily harm but cleared her of two other charges including attempted murder.

Birmingham Crown Court heard how Abdulrahman initially told police that her child had been kidnapped by strangers but the baby was found a few hours later, apparently lifeless, at the bottom of the chute.

Prosecutors alleged that the Iraqi national deliberately placed her baby daughter into the chute with the intention of killing her.

But Abdulrahman, who accepted that she put her baby into the chute, told the jury she was 'tired, sad and exhausted' in the week after her daughter's birth and unaware of why she was crying.

Rachel Brand QC, defending Abdulrahman, told the court that her client had been suffering from a post-natal psychosis - a severe form of post-natal depression.

Describing Abdulrahman, who came to the UK from Iraq in 2011, as a competent and loving mother, Miss Brand also argued that her illness meant she was not capable of 'forming an intent to either kill or cause really serious injury to her baby'.

The baby was wrapped in a piece of material before being thrown down the chute
The baby was wrapped in a piece of material before being thrown down the chute
The baby was found in a large bin wrapped in a piece of material after she was thrown down the rubbish chute 

Speaking through a Kurdish interpreter, Abdulrahman told the court she was in tears while cleaning her bathroom shortly before placing the baby in the chute.

'I was extremely sad,' she told jurors. 'I went to the living room, I put the baby in a rubbish bag and I threw her away.

'After I had done so, I just couldn't believe what I had just done, and I couldn't understand why I did it. I was in shock.'

    Answering questions from Ms Brand, Abdulrahman added that she had not 'planned' to do what she did and had not thought about what she was going to do.

    'Even now as I am speaking to you, I am still in a state of disbelief of what I have done. I have lost control of my thoughts when I did so.

    'I can't tell whether I was crying at the time or not, but I have done this. I wasn't aware of what I was doing. If I thought that by doing so I would do some harm to the baby, I wouldn't have done it.'

    Jailing Abdulrahman, judge Mrs Justice Kate Thirlwall said she accepted that the incident was not premeditated and that Abdulrahman was suffering from post-natal psychosis - a severe form of post-natal depression - at the time.

    She said: 'On September 2 last year you gave birth to your baby daughter. 

    'She fell from the fifth floor. She sustained critical head injuries from which she will never fully recover.

    'Six days later you placed her in a black bin liner and you placed that bin liner in the rubbish chute and closed that chute. 

    'You gave a false story to your husband and to the police about the baby being abducted. That story was obviously nonsense. 

    'It's quite clear that the jury were satisfied that you were suffering from postpartum psychosis (severe post-natal depression) at the time you acted. 

    'Anyone who sat through the whole trial will understand exactly how they came to that conclusion. 

    'As you said yourself, you were her mother. You should have been her guardian. You will have to live with the consequences of your actions for the rest of your life.'

    Abdulrahman was told she will serve half of her sentence in prison before serving the rest on licence. 
    She showed no emotion as she was led down from the dock. 

    Prosecutor Andrew Smith QC said the baby girl suffered serious brain injuries and was likely to need intensive support from medical professionals. 

    He also said it was unlikely she would be able to feed herself orally and that she was developing the signs of a severe form of cerebral palsy. 

    Abdulrahman's barrister Rachel Brand QC told the court: 'When you describe this as an utterly tragic case, one cannot be accused of exaggerating. 

    'This was a life shattering event for this little family. 

    'She (the baby) makes steady but slow medical progress. He (Abdulrahman's husband) has been constant in his attendance at the hospital and that's where he stays now. 

    'He's not here but I know he will welcome her back with open arms.'

    Abdulrahman moved to the UK to live in Wolverhampton, in the West Midlands, with her arranged marriage husband Mohamad Amin, 32, in August 2011.

    She told the jury she was happy in the marriage and she and her husband started trying for a baby as soon as she arrived in Britain before she eventually fell pregnant early in 2012.

    But days after giving birth, the court heard Abdulrahman suffered post natal depression.

    On the day she attacked the tot she also smashed up the Moses basket which she also lobbed down the rubbish chute.

    Police released a shocking digital reconstruction of the baby's fall which revealed it took just 2.2 seconds for the tot to fall from the fifth floor of the tower block to the ground.

    Experts said the impact the baby suffered was the equivalent of her being in a car crash at 30mph without wearing a seat belt.

    The baby was found in a communal rubbish area on the ground floor by Mr Amin wrapped in a headscarf-like material and surrounded by broken pieces of the tot's Moses basket.

    London Imam gets shot down by Robert Spencer


    British Christian graves sprayed with pro-Islam graffiti by vandals

    $
    0
    0

    A spokesman said:“We have a policy to remove racist or highly offensive graffiti as soon as possible. 

    “We were very keen to remove this as soon as possible to minimise any further distress to the families.”

    The council has appealed for information from anybody who saw people acting suspiciously around the graves. 

    “If we find out who is responsible we would certainly want them prosecuted and punished,” said the spokesman.

    The name on the defaced grave pictured has been disguised by the Citizen to avoid distress to relatives. Meanwhile other families who visit New Bradwell cemetery are furious about the vandalism.

     “We’re worried they will strike again and damage other headstones,” said one visitor.

    7-Year-Old Girl Treated by NHS for Genital Mutilation...

    $
    0
    0
    A girl of seven was the youngest victim of female genital mutilation (FGM) treated by the NHS in the past two years, according to new data.
    Some 1,700 women and girls were treated by specialist FGM clinics but this masks a bigger problem says the NSPCC.
    A UK-wide helpline to protect girls at risk of ritual cutting, practised by some African, Middle Eastern and Asian communities, goes live on Monday.
    The victims "are hidden behind a wall of silence", said Lisa Harker of NSPCC.
    The helpline is run by NSPCC child protection experts who have had training and advice from experts who work with women and girls who have undergone this form of ritual mutilation.
    Extreme pain
    The charity describes the practice as "illegal and life-threatening" and says that it results in extreme pain as well as physical and psychological problems that can continue into adulthood.
    Female genital mutilation, sometimes known as female circumcision has been illegal in the UK since 1985 - but still continues in secret, often carried out without anaesthetic.
    Some communities from parts of Africa and the Middle East, from both Muslim and Christian traditions, believe it is a necessary part of becoming a woman, that it reduces female sex drive and therefore the chances of sex outside marriage.

     Sometimes it is done in the UK.
    Sometimes girls are sent abroad to have it done.
    It involves the partial or total removal of the female genital organs, sometimes only leaving a small hole for urination or menstruation. The NSPCC says that victims are usually aged between four and 10 but some are younger.
    Comfort Momoh, a midwife at Guys and St Thomas's Hospital in London, collated the figures from the specialist clinics.
    She told BBC news that many women are not identified until they become pregnant and are examined by medical staff.
    Others suffer recurrent urinary tract infections and abdominal pain.
    "Many people are not aware they have had it done as it was carried out when they were babies."
    'Anonymous'
    The NSPCC says the free 24-hour helpline is aimed at anyone concerned that a child's welfare is at risk because of female genital mutilation, particularly teachers and medical staff, but they are also hoping that relatives will come forward.
    They stress that callers can remain anonymous but information on children at risk will be passed to police and social services.

    Start Quote

    We want this helpline to be a safe space for families who are against their daughter having female genital mutilation but feel powerless to stop it”
    Lisa HarkerNSPCC
    Ms Harker said: "There is also a huge pressure within these communities to keep quiet about female genital mutilation, with some people even being threatened with violence if they speak out.
    "We want this helpline to be a safe space for families who are against their daughter having female genital mutilation but feel powerless to stop it. Anyone from these communities can speak to us to get advice and help about female genital mutilation without fear of reprisal."
    Some 20,000 girls in England and Wales are thought to be at risk, according to government estimates, but there is a lack of accurate figures.
    Ms Momoh hopes that another benefit of the helpline will be to "generate more robust information and data".
    Crime prevention minister Jeremy Browne described the helpline as "a vital step towards eradicating this horrendous crime".
    "It builds on the work we have already undertaken through our violence against women and girls action plan to raise awareness, identify potential victims and prevent this form of child abuse."
    Det Ch Supt Keith Niven of the Metropolitan Police Service added: "This practice cannot be disguised as being part of any culture, it is child abuse and offenders will be relentlessly pursued."

    Countries where FGM is most common

    Name of countryPrevalence, 35-39 yearsPrevalence, 15-19 years
    SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, JUNE 2013
    Djibouti
    94.7%
    89.5%
    Egypt
    96.4%
    80.7%
    Eritrea
    92.6%
    78.3%
    Gambia
    79.5%
    79.9%
    Guinea
    98.6%
    89.3%
    Mali
    84.9%
    84.7%
    Sierra Leone
    96.4%
    75.5%
    Somalia
    98.9%
    96.7%

    Britain's Top Muslim Charged with Murdering 19 Intellectuals

    $
    0
    0
    A Bangladesh war crimes court Monday ordered a British-based Muslim leader and a US citizen to be tried in absentia for the murder of 19 intellectuals during the 1971 independence war, prosecutors said.
    The country's much criticised International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) charged Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin and Ashrafuzzaman Khan with 11 "crimes against humanity" counts including murder, confinement, abduction and torture.
    "They have been charged with the murder of 19 top intellectuals during the war. They included writers, university professors, doctors and journalists," senior prosecutor Ziad Al Malum told AFP, adding both face the death penalty if convicted.
    Rana Dasgupta, another prosecutor, told AFP that the court "has fixed July 15 for the opening statement" in their trial.
    Some of the intellectuals the two men are accused of murdering, Malum said, are Sirajuddin Hossain, the executive editor of the Ittefaq daily newspaper; top playwright and Dhaka University professor Muneer Chowdhury; and the popular novelist Shahidullah Kaiser.
    Both Mueen-Uddin and Khan were born in what was then East Pakistan before the nine-month war of independence against West Pakistan that ended in December 1971. They fled the country after Bangladesh successfully proclaimed its independence.
    "Mueen-Uddin is living in Britain and Khan in the United States. The court has ordered the trial to be held in absentia and has provided defence lawyers for them," Malum said, adding the court was not seeking their extradition.
    "It's up to the British people and their government whether they are going to extradite a top war crime accused or not," he said.
    Mueen-Uddin, 64, has held positions in a host of top Islamic organisations in his adopted homeland of Britain and was involved in setting up the Muslim Council of Britain - the largest umbrella group in the UK representing Muslims.
    The London-based former journalist, who denies any wrongdoing, was a newspaper reporter in the impoverished South Asian country when the war of independence broke out.
    He is accused of being a leading member of the notorious Al-Badr militia and of the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami political party, which opposed the country's break-away from Pakistan.
    Mueen-Uddin would face the death penalty if convicted and extradited - although historically Britain has always refused extradition requests if the charges carry a death sentence.
    Last week he told the BBC that he did not have confidence in the tribunal.
    "I am happy to respond to these charges in an open and fair court of law that is recognised by the international community," he said. "But I have little faith that the current process in Bangladesh is open nor just."
    Khan, a United States citizen, was a Dhaka University student leader during the war and who is now believed to be living in New York. Prosecutors described him as the "chief executor" for the Al-Badr militia. He has yet to make any public statement on the allegations.
    The tribunal has already charged 12 people with war crimes. Four Islamists have been sentenced, three of whom have been handed down death sentences by hanging, including the vice-president of Jamaat-e-Islami.
    Deadly protests over the trials have gripped the impoverished Muslim-majority country since January, when the court started handing out verdicts.
    Bangladesh has struggled to come to terms with its violent birth.
    The current government says up to three million people were killed in the war, many murdered by locals who collaborated with Pakistani forces.
    Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's government established the ICT in 2010 to try the collaborators, but it has been hit by a series of controversies. Human Rights Watch has said the tribunal's procedures fall short of international standards.

    Muslim group backed by hate preacher Anjem Choudary called IED 'mocks Britain’s war dead' with its name

    $
    0
    0
    Hate preacher Anjem Choudary is backing a new Muslim group accused of using its name to ridicule British soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.


    The Islamic Emergency Defence is already being shortened to IED, which also stands for the Improvised Explosive Devices used to kill or maim soldiers abroad. 

    Anjem Choudary, who said Drummer Lee Rigby 'will burn in hellfire' after he was executed on a Woolwich street a month ago, has an advisory role with the group.

    The new organisation says it has been set up to stop 'violent hooligans willing to inflict large scale carnage on innocent Muslims'. 

    They have also set up an emergency hotline for Muslims to call them instead of the police so incidents can be 'dealt with in a swift and Islamic manner'.

    Their website adds: 'Our aim is to build a national network of Muslim volunteers who are ready and able to protect and defend any Muslim from verbal and physical abuse.

    'Muslims should not be afraid to protect themselves or their brothers and sisters from acts of violence or hooliganism, because it is totally rational, sensible and above all: Islamic'.

    Critics have called Islamic Emergency Defence a vigilante group and said its name was inflammatory, but their members say its bomb-linked initials are a 'pure coincidence'. 

    'This is mocking Servicemen killed by IEDs.

     It shows their warped state of mind,' Former Scotland Yard terrorism expert John O'Connor told The Sun.

    Website: The Islamic Emergency Defence group encourages Muslims to call their hotline instead of police when they are attacked
    Website: The Islamic Emergency Defence group encourages Muslims to call their hotline instead of police when they are attacked
    Choudary tweeted 'good news' of the website's launch
    He then used Twitter to say the new body was defending Muslims
    He then urged the Muslim community to back the group

    But Choudary has used Twitter to urge people to join up and use the group as he announced the 'Good news with the launch', adding it had 'risen to the challenge'.

    Defending its task forces he added: 'People can look at it as a vigilante group but to protect and defend yourself is not illegal'.

    • But politicians have today stepped in to criticise. 

    'What is hoped to be achieved by this except offence and tension?' Shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said.

    Labour MP Rushanara Ali added: 'When groups encourage people to take the law into their own hands it needs to be stopped.'

    The Home Office has said the group is 'under review'.

    Wife in an arranged marriage 'was kept in a cage and raped by husband who told her "you deserve it" as he slashed the inside of her arm

    $
    0
    0
    During one attack the victim awoke bleeding with the accused cutting the inside for her arm and saying, 'you deserve it'.

    But when she tried to escape he stepped on her foot so hard he pulled off her toenail, Cambridge Crown Court heard.

    The victim recorded the alleged horrific domestic abuse on her smartphone in a bid to prove what her husband had done to her.

    In the shocking footage the defendant is seen standing over the victim with his arms folded.

    The screen then goes black when the suspected victim hides the phone and she can be heard crying out after she sustains a blow.

    The defendant then allegedly says: 'Get up, get up'.

    The jury was told the victim made 17 recordings in all, lasting from seconds to a minute or more.

    The defendant used to slam her head against the wall so violently the neighbours could hear a thud, the court was told.

    On one occasion it is also alleged he headbutted her forehead.

    James Barry, prosecuting, said: 'He bullied and threatened her verbally and physically.

     He punched and kicked her and he forced himself on her against her will.'

    The woman, who can not be named for legal reasons, was married to her husband in an Asian country and met him for the first time on their wedding day.

    He returned to the UK and the victim followed and they set up home in Cambridge.

    'He bullied and threatened her verbally and physically. He punched and kicked her and he forced himself on her against her will'

    - James Barry, prosecuting

    The defendant, who can not be named for legal reasons, was arrested after a family member raised concerns.

    Cambridgeshire Constabulary found him with what they described as an old fashioned razor in his hand.

    In an interview with police played to the jury, the woman said she could not work or be independent and was barred from leaving her home.

    She said: 'I knew that one day he would hit me but I just didn’t know when. He finally assaulted me after an argument at our home address.

    'I was scared for my personal safety and wanted to get away from him.

    'His parents kept calling me fat and he wouldn’t let me go out for a walk, so I asked if I could go out to the gym. His father said: “What difference will it make? She’ll still be fat".'

    The defendant denies 11 charges including three of rape, four of assault and three of causing actual bodily harm.

    At an earlier hearing he admitted two further charges including putting his wife under fear of violence.
    The trial continues.

    Viewing all 3867 articles
    Browse latest View live