Quantcast
Channel: Exposing Islam.
Viewing all 3867 articles
Browse latest View live

‘WHIRWIND OF HATE’ Jewish students attacked by pro-Muslim Palestine baying mob ON UK SOIL

$
0
0

POLICE were forced to step in over ugly scenes at a pro-Israel event after pro-Palestine protesters allegedly tried to prevent the lecture at a leading university from happening.

Students at University College London (UCL) attending the Friends of Israel event where Israeli writer Hen Mazzig was speaking described “terrifying” scenes as they locked themselves inside a lecture room when about 100 protesters started chanting and banging on the doors.
Student Devora Khafi, a campus director for pro-Israel group StandWithUs UK, claimed she suffered a panic attack after allegedly being assaulted by a pro-Palestinian activist on Thursday evening.
She described the protest as “a whirlwind of hate”.
Writing on Twitter, she said: “I was assaulted. We were attacked. But freedom will prevail.”
Mr Mazzig’s appearance was given the green light at the last minute but was seen as controversial due to his time with the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). 
Footage showed crowds of pro-Palestine campaigners with placards who were shouting “shame” at those who had come for the talk and were trapped inside.
Hen Mazzig
Twitter
The protest happened outside a talk by Hen Mazzig
Mr Mazzig posted a Facebook live video showing more than 20 policemen trying to put themselves in between a crowd shouting “free, free Palestine” and the room where the lecture was.
A man banging on the window is then heard saying: “From river to the sea, Palestinian will be free.”
In the video, the Israeli speaker said: “I don’t think that even in my days in the IDF it was as bad as it is right now.
“It’s really scary. I hear they’ve been attacking some girls, Jewish girls who came to support my talk and wow, it’s crazy, they’re really out of their mind.” 
fight at UCL
Twitter
Students at UCL said they were terrified
He said he managed to escape from the room by disguising himself as a security guard, after being ordered to by the police.
Elliot Miller, who works as the National Organiser for Student Rights at The Henry Jackson Society think tank, said: “Students who deprive others of basic rights through intimidating protest should be disciplined. 
“Student Rights will stand for personal safety and basic liberties and combat bigotry at every opportunity.
“At present, Jews all too often find they have no safe space on campus, and when confronted with aggressive and violent protesters, universities often fail to adequately provide the necessary security”
Police at UCL
Twitter
Police were called to UCL
UCL and its union said they “do not condone acts of intimidation or violence under any circumstances and, as a university with a longstanding radical history, we fiercely support the right to exercise free speech within the law”.
In a statement they said they worked with their security team and the Metropolitan police to ensure the event could go ahead.
They added: “It was widely advertised and open to the public, and as a result a small but noisy group of protesters attended and occupied the rooms where the event was originally meant to take place. 
“We regret protesters took measures to try to prevent the event from happening but stress that the protest was non-violent.”
A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism, told Express.co.uk: “One has to ask why Israeli Jewish speakers attract such angry, violent protest, whilst Israeli non-Jewish speakers do not. 
“The fact is that almost half of the world’s Jews live in Israel, which is the physical centre of the Jewish religion, yet universities are quite happy for these violent bullies to protest anything short of Jewish students in Britain fully severing their ties with Israel. 
“Criticism of Israel is not antisemitic, but these protests are not criticism, they are a deliberate campaign of harassment and bullying, and their targets are overwhelmingly Jewish students. 
“The perpetrators must be investigated and punished where crimes or breaches of university rules of conduct have occurred. Universities must get their act together and provide proper security on campus.”
Scotland Yard said they were called at 7pm to the university campus in central London where officers let the demonstration go ahead after speaking to UCL’s security officers.
Police remained at the scene until the meeting ended safely, a spokeswoman said.
She added: “Following this, a woman made an allegation of common assault to officers and this is currently being investigated by Camden Police. No arrests were made.”

Up to 50 UK families have had their children taken into care over fears they were being radicalised by jihadi-supporting parents

$
0
0
  • Counterterrorism police boss warns over number of radicalised families 
  • Mark Rowley said parents had tried to take teenagers to Syria to join ISIS 
  • Last week couple arrested over trying to fly their five children to Syria  
  • More than 700 people from UK have gone to fight for terror groups
Children are being removed from families and taken into care over fears their radicalised parents plan to carry out terror attacks.

Mark Rowley, head of national counter terrorism policing, said up to 50 radicalised families have been taken to court since last year. 

The police boss said parents had tried to take teenagers and even young children to Syria to join ISIS and other terror groups. 

Teenagers (from left) Amira Abase, Kadiza Sultana, and Shamima Begum, walk through Gatwick airport, before catching a flight to Turkey last year to join Syrian extremists

Last week a couple were arrested on suspicion of attempting to fly their five children to Syria from Luton airport.

Since 2004, more than 700 British people have travelled to Syria and Iraq to join ISIS. 

Rowley told The Sunday Times: 'The most extreme cases that end up . . . with children being made wards of courts or care proceedings is real tricky stuff because we've never had to deal with national security issues before in a family court . . . We had never done [a case] before 2015 but . . . the fact that it's [now] into 40 or 50 cases is illustrative of the scale of the problem.  


'Now we're seeing young children and teenagers who have been influenced by propaganda and who need support. Sometimes, frankly, their parents are part of the problem and sometimes it's happening despite their parents' best efforts — there's both types of examples out there.'

Around 50 young people are investigated by Scotland Yard a month over fears they are being radicalised.  

Rowley said teachers and social workers were now more proactive in informing police of concerns they had.


He commented on the 'awful' case of the London teenagers Amira Abase, Kadiza Sultana, and Shamima Begum, who flew to join Syrian extremists last year.  

The girls, from Tower Hamlets, kept the plans secret from their parents and told them they were going out for the day before they fled on the flight to Turkey.  

Scotland Yard has a team of 400 detectives, language and computer experts who work proactively to stop vulnerable children being radicalised.  

Police launched the National Digital Exploitation Service last month to track terrorist groups targeting children. 

Rowley, who is tipped to apply to be Metropolitan Police commissioner, said the force seizes around 700 devices, like laptops and smartphones, used to publish terrorist plans and propaganda, a month. 

Last week police bosses said 10 plots to carry out terrorist attacks had been stopped in the past two years and that 550 'live' cases are being followed.     

Police foil at least 10 terror plots in two years and are dealing with 550 'live' investigations at any time

$
0
0
  • Scotland Yard's Neil Basu said 850 Britons regarded as a security threat
  • The number of armed police was being increased ‘dramatically’, he said 
  • The review was commissioned by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan 
Police and the security services have foiled at least ten terror plots in the last two years, a top counter-terrorism officer has revealed.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, Scotland Yard’s new anti-terror chief, said the authorities are dealing with around 550 ‘live’ investigations at any one time.

Mr Basu wrote in an internet post, published by the National Police Chiefs’ Council, that 850 Britons regarded as a security threat are believed to have taken part in the Syrian conflict, of which around half have returned to the UK.


CAUGHT BY POLICE AND SECURITY SERVICES BEFORE THEY COULD CARRY OUT MASS KILLINGS ON LONDON STREETS 

Tarik  Hassane, 22, admitted to conspiracy to murder and preparation of acts of terrorism. He was jailed in 2014 for planning a drive-by attack on police officers and soldiers
Tarik Hassane, 22, admitted to conspiracy to murder and preparation of acts of terrorism. He was jailed in 2014 for planning a drive-by attack on police officers and soldiers

Tarik 'The Surgeon' Hassane, 22, was jailed in 2014 for planning a drive-by attack on police officers and soldiers in central London. 

He admitted conspiracy to murder and preparation of acts of terrorism. He was an Osama bin Laden fanatic and wanted to kill hundreds of people in a major terrorism act. 

He, along with Suhaib Majeed, were jailed for life in April.
Mohammed Rehman, 25, plotted with his wife Sana Ahmed Khan, 24, to blow up Westfield Shopping Centre or the London Underground on the 10th anniversary of the 7/7 bombings.
Their plot was only foiled when Rehman - who called himself the 'silent bomber' - sent a tweet asking for advice on which was the best target.

Officers found 10kg of nitrate explosives - double the amount of powder used in the failed 21/7 London bombings - in his home. The pair have been jailed for life.     

Mohammed Rehman, 25, plotted with his wife Sana Ahmed Khan, 24, to blow up Westfield Shopping Centre or the London Underground on the 10th anniversary of the 7/7 bombings
Mohammed Rehman, 25, plotted with his wife Sana Ahmed Khan, 24, to blow up Westfield Shopping Centre or the London Underground on the 10th anniversary of the 7/7 bombings
‘The counter-terrorism network and security services have foiled at least ten attacks in the last two years,’ he added, ‘with 294 convictions for terror-related offences.

‘As soon as Daesh [Islamic State] started to lose on the battlefields abroad, it was clear their tactics would be directed closer to home.’


The number of armed police was being increased ‘dramatically’, he said, so officers are ‘better able to reach a scene quickly, gain control and stop the threat’. 

The revelations came as a new report warned that Britain’s borders are not secure against attempts to smuggle weapons and terrorists into the country.

The review, commissioned by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, warned of ‘real concerns’ about how easy it is to smuggle guns and people into the UK – and said Paris-style gun attacks are the ‘new normal’ for Islamic State terrorists.

FORMER SUPERMARKET SECURITY GUARD PLOTTED TO BEHEAD A POPPY SELLER ON REMEMBRANCE DAY

Nadir Syed was found guilty of planning a terrorist act earlier this year
Nadir Syed was found guilty of planning a terrorist act earlier this year
Nadir Syed was jailed for life after he was found guilty of preparing acts of terrorism in an attack he hoped would out-do the brutality of Lee Rigby's murder.

The 23-year-old will serve a minimum sentence of 15 years before he is eligible for parole.

Detectives believe Syed planned to sever the head of his victim and hold it up for the camera.

They feared Syed was just three days from launching his attack, aimed at a poppy seller on Remembrance Day or possibly a Police Special Constable.  
Its author, Labour peer Toby Harris, said: ‘Our borders are not as secure as they should be and much greater efforts should be made to prevent the illegal transportation of weapons and people into the country.

 It would be naive in the extreme to assume that would-be terrorists will not attempt to exploit any such weaknesses.’

He called for assurances that screening and searching of cars and freight at border ports was being ‘significantly enhanced’.

His review also called for greater use of mobile barriers to protect against a Nice-style attack– in which a terrorist used an HGV to mow down members of the public.

And he said all schools in the capital should have evacuation plans to deal with a terror attack. 

British sharia court 'is protecting wife-beating suspects by sabotaging criminal proceedings against them' women's rights group claims

$
0
0
  • Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (Mat) is one of 80 Islamic 'councils' in Britain
  • Southall Black Sisters says it protects men accused of domestic violence
  • Mat 'uses position of power' to persuade the CPS to drop charges brought
  • Women's rights group has submitted evidence to sharia courts inquiry
  • Sharia courts have been dispensing Islamic justice in UK since 1982
The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal has been accused of persuading the CPS to drop domestic violence charges and encourage women to return to abusive partners
The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal has been accused of persuading the CPS to drop domestic violence charges and encourage women to return to abusive partners
A top sharia court has been accused of using its position to 'sabotage' criminal charges brought against men accused of domestic violence.

The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (Mat), based in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, was set up in 2007 to help resolve civil and family disputes in accordance with Islamic law.

According to the Mat website, the body cannot deal with criminal offences, but 'where there are criminal charges such as assault within the context of domestic violence, the parties can ask Mat to assist in reaching reconciliation. 

'The terms of such a reconciliation can then be passed on to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)  through the local Police Domestic Violence Liaison Officers with a view to reconsidering the criminal charges.' 

But Southall Black Sisters, a women's rights group, argues that Mat is effectively 'sabotaging criminal proceedings' against men accused of domestic violence by asking the CPS to 'reconsider' any charges.

As part of written evidence submitted to a home affairs inquiry launched in July into sharia courts, the Southall Black Sisters questioned the role of tribunals like Mat.

In a statement, the group wrote: 'The Mat, for example, actively involves itself in criminal proceedings on domestic violence, despite stating that it is unable to deal with criminal offences.

'It uses its position of power to persuade the CPS to drop charges and to encourage women to reconcile with abusive partners without reference to court orders they may already have or to risk assessments and safety planning.'

Sharia Courts have advised the Muslim community on religious matters in the UK since 1982
Sharia Courts have advised the Muslim community on religious matters in the UK since 1982

It added: 'Sharia councils and the Mat hold themselves out to be ‘courts of law’ but they are in fact highly arbitrary decision making forums that use dominant, patriarchal and authoritarian interpretations of Muslim codes which are passed off as ‘sharia’ laws.'

The inquiry on sharia councils, of which there are now about 80 in Britain, is due to hear evidence from a number of witnesses on Tuesday. 

A home affairs inquiry has begun on sharia councils, of which there are around 80 in Britain
A home affairs inquiry has begun on sharia councils, of which there are around 80 in Britain

Lord Macdonald, former director of public prosecutions, told The Sunday Times: 'When a formal criminal charge is laid it is not appropriate for an extrajudicial institution to bring the victim and her alleged attacker together to seek a 'resolution' beyond the control of the UK courts and certainly not where that institution itself has a questionable approach to the rights of women and to their supposed place in society.'

Mat said: 'We condemn actions taken by anyone to restrict or impede the pathway to justice sought by any victim of domestic violence.' 

'Child migrant' who said he was 16 when he came to the UK from the Calais Jungle boasts of being 22 on a dating website...

$
0
0
  • Haris Stanikzai was among the first 14 children to arrive from the Jungle
  • He told UK authorities he was 16 years of age but had no documentation 
  • His LinkedIn profile claims he is in the third year of an accounting degree
  • A profile on an internet dating website claimed Stanikzai was 22 years old
A child migrant who arrived in Britain last week has boasted on his online dating profile that he was 22 and has a LinkedIn profile where he claims he spent three years in university. 

Haris Stanikzai from Afghanistan told Home Office officials he was only 16 and arrived in London on October 17 to live with his uncle Jan Ghazi. 

However, several photographs posted on social media place doubts on his age, especially his LinkedIn profile which claims he has spent three years as a student in Jahan University in Kabul where he was studying accounting and finance. 

Haris Stanikzai, pictured on his Google + account, told UK authorities that he was 16 when he was evacuated from the Jungle camp in Calais, although social media accounts claim he is 22
Haris Stanikzai, pictured on his Google + account, told UK authorities that he was 16 when he was evacuated from the Jungle camp in Calais, although social media accounts claim he is 22
Stanikzai, left, this image, right on his LinkedIn page claiming to be a university student
Stanikzai, left, pictured hugging his uncle Jan Ghazi, right, was given a document from the Home Office claiming he was 17, and was one of the first 14 migrant children to arrive last week
Stanikzai, left, pictured hugging his uncle Jan Ghazi, right, was given a document from the Home Office claiming he was 17, and was one of the first 14 migrant children to arrive last week
Stanikzai, left, pictured with his uncle Jan Ghazi, right, at his new home in South London 
Stanikzai, left, pictured with his uncle Jan Ghazi, right, at his new home in South London 

Stanikzai was one of the first child migrants to arrive in Britain following the deal with French authorities after the Dubs amendment to fast-track the claims of unaccompanied minors. 

However, as soon as Stanikzai and his fellow migrants arrived, there was considerable controversy as many appeared to be far older than children. 

After his arrival in Britain,  Stanikzai, who arrived on Monday, said he was 16 – but he had been given an 'official' date of birth that makes him 17.

The Afghan youngster, who does not have a birth certificate, said the Home Office told him that he was born on January 1, 1999.

Haris told the Mail: 'I am 16 years old.' His uncle Jan Ghazi added: 'I do not know the exact day and month that he was born, but he is my nephew and I know, I can see, that he is 16.

'The Home Office may have said that his birth is on a particular date and I do not want to have an argument with them over it, but he is younger.'

If a refugee does not have a birth certificate, a Home Office screening officer can certify them as a child based on their 'physical appearance and demeanour'.

Unless the asylum seeker appears 'significantly' over 18, they should be 'afforded the benefit of the doubt and treated as children'.

When officials believe the refugee is a child but not the age they claim, screening officers will estimate a date of birth and write the word 'disputed' on their application form.

Last week, Stanikzai claimed in newspaper interviews that he was the last of his six siblings to survive the war in Afghanistan and the people smugglers. 

Stanikzai, pictured on his Twitter profile, right, insists he is 16 and has been given documents from the Home Office to state that he was born on January 1, 1999 in line with UN policy
Ghazi, pictured at his new home, must report on a fortnightly basis to an immigration centre
Ghazi, pictured at his new home, must report on a fortnightly basis to an immigration centre
Stanikzai, is among almost 300 migrants who have benefited from the Dubs amendment
Stanikzai, is among almost 300 migrants who have benefited from the Dubs amendment

According to the Sunday Times, Ghazi told the newspaper that his nephew must now report on a fortnightly basis to an immigration centre in South London, having been issued with a 'notification to a person who is liable to be detained'. 

French officials confirmed Britain has so far accepted almost 300 child migrants since they started to demolish the Jungle camp. 

The Home Office told MailOnline that they do not comment on individual cases. 

According to an agreement drawn up between French and British authorities, physical appearance and demeanour will be assessed to identify an individual's age in the absence of documentary evidence. 

In cases where there is no documentary evidence, but the individual is judged to be a minor, they will be assigned the date January 1 in the year of their birth on all offical documentation in accordance with UNHCR rules. 

If a migrant is found to be over the age of 18, they will be processed through the adult system. 
Under the current system, unaccompanied minors who do not qualify for asylum are granted leave to remain for 30 months - or until they reach 17 and a half if there is no 'safe and adequate' arrangements in their home country. 

However, these individuals can apply for 'leave to remain' which will be 'considered on a case-by-case basis'.

Labour council blasted as 'hypocrites' for bringing migrant children to the UK because they 'had to do something' - then refusing to house them when they got here

$
0
0
  • Council pledged to bring migrant children to the UK from camps in Calais
  • Hammersmith and Fulham made promise after a visit to the Jungle camp 
  • But now they have refused to house them and after newcomers arrived
  • Council bosses denied claim and said they are 'ready for more' refugees
A Labour council has been branded 'publicity seeking' after demanding migrants be sheltered in their area - then refusing to house them or foot the bill when they arrived.

Hammersmith and Fulham Council, in wealthy West London, pledged to take in more migrants from Calais.

But after 'posturing' the council has organised for the newcomers to stay outside their area, and demanded that the UK government foot the bill for their relocation.

Cllr Harry Phibbs, a Conservative member of Hammersmith and Fulham, has blasted the 'hypocrisy' of his opponents.

He said: 'There has been a lot of talk of being moral and caring but there's been very little practical action. 

'In a way the main point would be the hypocrisy, they are saying 'we've got to show how moral and caring we are, but when it comes down to it we won't do anything practical to help'.
'I think it's political posturing and publicity seeking.'

The Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council's policy to welcome more unaccompanied child migrants was prompted by its leader visiting the Jungle camp in Calais.

Council Leader Stephen Cowan pledged to shelter vulnerable migrants in his West London borough after seeing first hand their terrible living conditions.

It is believed that so far Hammersmith and Fulham have welcomed five newcomers to the council area - and they have been put into foster care elsewhere.

The government rather than the council will now pay for the housing, healthcare and education of the new arrivals.

Cllr Cowan has said the challenge is now to find a home for 'every single one' of the 1,500 children in Calais, after being moved by their plight.

His council has pledged to help 15 individuals stranded in France.

A council spokeswoman has denied that the authority has refused to house immigrants from the Jungle camp in the borough.

She said: 'Claims that Hammersmith & Fulham Council has refused to house children from Calais are simply not true.

Cllr Stephen Cowan,  was moved to bring migrants to Hammersmith and Fulham after visiting the camps in Calais. Cllr Harry Phibbs has criticised the 'hypocricy' of the council

'We've never refused to house refugee children from Calais and there is no evidence to support the claim that we have.

'In fact, the Home Office has confirmed that it received our letter confirming we will take an additional 15 refugee children from the Calais camp on top of those refugee children that we already take under the government's voluntary National Transfer Scheme.

'It is also not true that we have asked the government to fund the cost of moving any children.
'The chaos in the government's assessment processes and their administration of this crisis is the only reason there are still hundreds of unaccompanied children in Calais and the only reason we don't currently have more Calais children being cared for by Hammersmith & Fulham. We are ready and waiting to take more.' 

Conservative Cllr Harry Phibbs has rebuked the 'virtue signalling' of the council.

He said: 'It's like these all these celebrities you get going to Calais – which is not very far to go - they have taken hardly any people after demanding more be taken, for all their posturing.

'Also, rather than more publicity stunts perhaps we should be taking them from the camps in Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey - where they have been driven out by ISIS.

 There been a lot of virtue signalling about how caring they are, but not much being done.' 

Since mid-October, more than 300 children have arrived in Britain from Calais and more transfers are due in the coming days, according to the Home Office.

Imam loses libel action against BBC over 'extreme' claim

$
0
0
Shakeel Begg
An influential imam has lost a libel action against the BBC after a judge ruled he had promoted violence.
London-based Shakeel Begg sued after being accused on the Sunday Politics show of espousing extreme beliefs.
The judge said Lewisham Islamic Centre's chief imam had hidden his true views behind a cloak of respectability.
Mr Justice Haddon-Cave said he "clearly promotes and encourages violence in support of Islam and espouses a series of extremist Islamic positions".
"On occasions when it has suited him…he has shed the cloak of respectability and revealed the horns of extremism."
A spokesman for the BBC welcomed the ruling against the imam who now faces an enormous legal bill.
Imam Begg is extremely influential among followers of hardline conservative Islam in the UK.
He has been involved in inter-faith work with Jewish and Christian leaders but has also faced accusations of extremism, including supporting organisations that have campaigned on behalf of suspected terrorists.
He personally appealed to the self-styled Islamic State group to spare the British hostage Alan Henning - a sign of his theological credibility within their branch of Islam.

'Jekyll and Hyde'

In November 2013, BBC presenter Andrew Neil alleged on the Sunday Politics that the imam had said that jihad was the greatest of deeds.
Jihad typically refers to a personal struggle to do good - but violent extremists use it to refer to fighting holy war.
Despite the imam's protestations during the libel trial, Mr Justice Haddon-Cave said four of his speeches showed he had promoted such violence and two that he had espoused extremist positions.
"Shakeel Begg, is something of a Jekyll and Hyde character," he said.
"He appears to present one face to the general, local and inter-faith community and another to particular Muslim and other receptive audiences. The former face is benign, tolerant and ecumenical.
"The latter face is ideologically extreme and intolerant."
In one speech in 2006, Imam Begg encouraged a student audience to fight in the Palestinian territories. Two years later he praised Muslims who had travelled abroad to fight enemies of Islam.
A third speech outside the maximum security Belmarsh Prison in south-east London, which holds some of the most dangerous terrorism convicts in the country, was described by the judge as "particularly sinister".
He said: "The various core extremist messages which emerge from the claimant's speeches and utterances would, in my view, have been quite clear to the audiences.
"The claimant's ostensible cloak of respectability is likely to have made his [extremist] message in these speeches all the more compelling and seductive. For this reason, therefore, his messages would have been all the more effective and dangerous.
"It is all too easy for someone in the claimant's position of power and influence as an Imam to plant the seed of Islamic extremism in a young mind, which is then liable to be propagated on the internet."
A spokesman for the BBC said: "We were right to stand by the journalism of the Sunday Politics. The judge has concluded, based on the evidence, that Imam Begg has preached religious violence and an extremist worldview in his remarks."

Turkish pensioner, 67, 'went on vicious stabbing spree outside Sainsbury's supermarket and injured four women at random to get his revenge on police'

$
0
0
  • Ethem Orhon went on a stabbing rampage outside the store in Hampton
  • He'd been released just 90 minutes before having spent night in police cell
  • Mother-of-two Janet Morsy, 62, was stabbed 12 times with a four-inch knife
  • Orhon doesn't dispute committing stabbings but denies attempted murder
Turkish pensioner stabbed four women in a Sainsbury's car park just 90 minutes after he was released by police, a court heard. 

Ethem Orhon went on the rampage outside the store in Hampton, south west London, after he was arrested the day before for alleged drugs possession and carrying a knife, jurors heard.

The 'deranged' 67-year-old, who was described as being 6ft 3in, carried out the attacks just 90 minutes after police released him the following morning, it is alleged.

Four women, aged between 53 and 71, were injured in the attack at the Sainsbury's store
Four women, aged between 53 and 71, were injured in the attack at the Sainsbury's store

Mother-of-two Janet Morsy, 62, was left fighting for her life in hospital after she was stabbed a dozen times with a four-inch blade, Kingston Crown Court heard.

Suzanna Brand, 53, Jean Sullivan, 68, and Charandasi Chandiramani, 71, were also seriously injured.

Orhon, who lives in Hampton, Middlesex, does not dispute the stabbings but denies two counts of attempted murder, and two counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. 

Jonathan Polnay, prosecuting, said Orhon 'regretted' his actions but was not in 'control' at the time. 

He said: 'This case is about a vicious stabbing spree, committed by this defendant, Ethem Aydin Orhon, against four entirely innocent members of the public.

JURORS SHOWN CCTV FOOTAGE OF ORHON RUNNING AROUND CAR PARK 'LOOKING FOR HIS NEXT VICTIM'

Dramatic CCTV footage of Orhon allegedly attacking two of the women with a knife was shown to jurors today.
He is seen first chasing a schoolboy before turning his attention to Jean Sullivan and stabbing her in the back as she tried to flee.
After that, Orhon is allegedly seen running around the carpark before finding his next victim, Janet Morsy.
He appears to grab her with his left hand before plunging a knife into her body.
Miraculously, Ms Sullivan, unaware she has been stabbed in the back, climbs into her car and reverses out.
It is only when she has driven halfway round the carpark that she realises she has been stabbed, stops and seeks help.
Members of the public are then seen helping her before police arrive just minutes later. 
'By stabbing innocent women, doing their shopping in Sainsbury's, the defendant aimed to get his revenge on police, for what he perceived as mistreatment of him.'

All four women were stabbed in or near the Tangle Park car park by Hampton Sainsbury's on May 20.

Holding up a knife with a 4in blade, Mr Polnay told the jury that Orhon 'plunged this knife at least 20 times into four innocent members of the public who had been doing their shopping'.

The court heard how two schoolboys, who cannot be named for legal reasons, distracted the defendant and called 999. 

Horrified onlookers, including the schoolchildren, other shoppers and passers-by, saw the attack. 

Mr Polnay said: 'You will also hear about the true bravery of two schoolboys from Hampton Grammar school.

'They distracted the defendant, warned others that he was armed and dangerous, called police, and remained on the phone with the 999 operator the entire time.

'They had decided as long as the defendant was concentrating on them then he would not be hurting anyone else.

'It was a calculated risk the boys took having realised that they were obviously much faster than him.

'Without their help it may be more people would have been attacked.'

Detailing the attacks, Mr Polnay said: 'Suzanna Brand was on her way to meet her mother in Sainsbury's as she always does at 10.30am on a Friday.

'The defendant came up behind her, Miss Brand didn't even have a chance to defend herself. He stabbed her twelve times.

'All she was able to do was kick out at the defendant when she was on the ground.'

Mr Polnay told jurors Miss Brand, who has learning difficulties, was stabbed in her back, side, arm and leg, and suffered two collapsed lungs and a laceration to the liver.

WOMAN, 71, DESCRIBES MOMENT SHE WAS STABBED AFTER SHE CHECKED BUS TIMES NEAR THE SUPERMARKET 

Charandasi Chandiramani, who described Orhon as 'deranged', told the court of her ordeal. She said: 'I was about to check when the next bus was coming over when suddenly I heard a terrible scream.
'It seemed to very prolonged. I saw a woman on the ground and a man standing next to her. This woman was on the ground and he was still hurting her.
'I did not know he had a knife, I thought he was punching or hitting her. He looked up and made eye contact with me.
'I ran away, I was terrified, he came running towards me. I had a bag with me but in fear and terror I left it at the bus stop. I knew I was in danger so ran across the car park. I ran as fast as I could. He came after me and he stabbed me twice in the back.
'I ran to the car park where I knew there would be more activity and I'd be safer.'
Ms Chandiramani told jurors she had seen a car driving away in the car park and then flagged it down.
She said: 'I asked a woman for help. By this point I felt wetness in my back and knew I had been stabbed.'
Ms Chandiramani had described Orhon as looking 'deranged and on a mission' in her police statement.
Miss Sullivan was carrying her shopping to her car when she heard a woman's voice screaming 'don't stab me'.

The prosecutor said: 'She located this "hysterical woman" and parked her car and got out.
'On exiting her car she felt a pain in the right side of her back, she reached around and felt her back with her right hand.

'On inspection she could see that she had blood on her hand.'

Miss Sullivan was taken by ambulance to St George's Hospital, south London, where she was found to have been stabbed in the right side of the back of her lower chest, with injuries to her chest wall muscle, her right lung and her liver.

Mr Polnay told the court the third victim, Ms Morsey, was attacked while walking to the bus stop.
She said Orhon towered over her and was about 6ft 3in: 'I zapped [locked] the car, walked away and then I heard what sounded like a woman shouting "there's a man with a knife".

'About this time this man appeared in front of me. 'It was held outwards so I could see what was coming. It looked dirty. I looked at him and he looked at me and I could see what was happening.

'I said "please don't hurt me, please don't do it please". He seemed to do it with intent, he didn't hesitate.

'He started to lurch towards me, I was now paralysed to the spot.

 He swung his arm back to get a good swing, I put my arm up and he stabbed me in the ribcage.

'I started screaming.'

Mr Polnay said she was attacked with a four inch long 'dirty knife'. Ms Morsy was admitted to intensive care as the stab wound had severed a vein and blood was draining into her chest.

Orhon was then arrested by police. He was wearing the same clothes from the day before and carrying a rucksack containing Turkish identification materials, a UK passport, 1,075 euros and £307.87 in cash, the jury was told.

The court heard Orhon had been arrested the day before the attack on suspicion of drugs possession in Kensington
The court heard Orhon had been arrested the day before the attack on suspicion of drugs possession in Kensington

SCHOOLBOY WHO DISTRACTED THE DEFENDANT SAID ORHON WAS 'UNBELIEVABLY SCARY' AND WAS GOING AFTER 'ANYONE HE COULD GET NEAR'

The boy described watching the 71-year-old Charandasi Chandiramani banging on a car door, asking the driver for help before being spotted by Orhon.
He said: 'He was following her. But then he sees us, forgets about her, and we're not sure about this guy. 'We didn't feel too unsafe just yet. He comes across the road towards us.
'We thought, "this is just wrong". He is still walking, and we just thought he was a bit wrong in the head. He didn't look right. He looked bat-s*** f****** insane.
'Maybe he was off his meds or something.'
The boy said as the man approached he revealed the knife in his right hand.
'As he came towards us he was almost calm, but his eyes were just wrong,' he said.
'He was making stabbing motions at us. I stumbled again. I'm not thinking clearly. At this point, he starts to come after me.
'He didn't have a specific target. He was just going after anyone he could get near to. The way he was moving was unbelievably scary.'
Mr Polnay said Orhon came to the UK from Turkey in 1989, and had lived in a council property for 14 years, a home that was only minutes away from the supermarket.

The court heard Orhon had been arrested the day before the attack on suspicion of drugs possession in Kensington.

He was also found with a 'Leatherman' knife but bailed the next morning to attend court at a later date.

The court heard Orhon later said in a police interview that he had felt 'mentally tortured' by police, adding: 'I went home and got my other Leatherman. I shouldn't have done it. I feel bad. It was a loss of control. I felt humiliated.'

Describing the attack on Ms Chandiramani, the prosecutor said: 'The defendant ran towards her at speed. She felt two hits to her low back. She was running for her life.'

Mr Polnay added: 'On his arrival home he picked up his spare Leatherman and went straight back out.'

Police later searched Orhon's home and found a guide to the London Underground with the words 'murder at green lights' written in pen, a newspaper cutting about a terrorist attack and brochures advertising Leatherman knives. 

Mr Polnay told jurors Orhon does not dispute the stabbings.

He added: 'He said he regretted it now but was not under his own control.

'The only issue that you will have to determine is what he intended when he stabbed each of those four women.

'Quite why, or what thinking process led him to do what he did, we may never know.'

The trial continues.  



Hundreds of convicted terrorists are back on UK streets after serving sentences and do not have to change their extremist views

$
0
0
  • Out of 583 jailed in UK for terror offences since 2001, 418 now out again
  • Three were sentenced to life and 24 were serving more than four years 
  • At least four of them were people who helped the 21/7 suicide bombers 
The vast majority of terrorists convicted in Britain since 9/11 have already been released from prison and are back on the streets, it was revealed today.

Out of a total of 583 jailed in the UK for terror offences since 2001 around 418 have been released again, including three who were given life sentences.

This group, 164 of whom walked free since 2014, included several people who helped the suicide bombers who failed to blow themselves up in London three weeks after 7/7. 

Adel Yahya one of the men accused of planning the 21/7 terror attacks is a free men
Ismail Abdurahman helped a 21/7 bomber
Out: Adel Yahya and Ismail Abdurahman were both jailed for their part in the 21/7 plot - either helping a suspect afterards or collecting information for them - and both are now free men

New research by Sky News found that 104 left prison after serving between a year and four years, while 24 were released after more than four years. 

Some are understood to have been released without agreeing to take part in anti-radicalisation classes while behind bars.

Omar Khyam, who was jailed for a plot to blow up a shopping centre and nightclub in Kent with homemade bombs, is among the two thirds of extremist prisoners who refused to change their views. 

Former jihadi Hanif Qadir who now runs a counter-extremism outreach said deradicalisation in jails is 'failing miserably'.

He said: 'There are experts out there that are equipped and able to tackle the problem but they are not the ones that are doing it in prison.

'At the moment the prison imams, God bless them, they're not adequate and they're not experienced enough to tackle the problem of radicalisation within prisons.'

Yeshi Girma knew of husband Hussain Osman's plan to blow up a Tube train but did nothing. She was secretly freed in 2013
Lord Blunkett, who was Labour's Home Secretary when many were jailed, told Sky News: 'It's perfectly reasonable to say that once someone's served their sentence, if it isn't possible to reassess them, we should continue to monitor them outside prison.

'So, if there's any indication at all that they are reconnecting with organised terrorist groups, the intervention can take place very quickly rather than allowing them to commit another act and then having to try to pick them up again.' 

At least four criminals jailed for their part in the 21/7 plot have been freed, with some moved to hostels or council properties.

Adel Yahya, who admitted collecting information useful to terrorists and jailed for six years and nine months in November 2007.

 He is believed to have been freed by 2010.

Yeshi Girma knew of husband Hussain Osman's plan to blow up a Tube train but did nothing. She was secretly freed in 2013.

Ismail Abdurahman was released from prison after just three years behind bars for helping the July 21 bombers in 2005. 

He was moved to a bail hostel after winning an appeal against a bid to send him to Somalia. This year the British Government was ordered him more than£13,000 because his human rights were 'violated' during police interviews over a plot to attack London. 

Zahoor Iqbal, 35, Mohammed Irfan, 36 and Hamid Elasmar, 49 were freed and living in Birmingham despite being linked to a plot to slaughter a serviceman 'like a pig'. 

It came as the head of MI5 has warned that the police and security services will not be able to stop all terrorist attacks on Britain despite their successes in recent years.

Andrew Parker, director general of the domestic intelligence agency, revealed yesterday that 12 terrorist plots in the UK had been foiled since 2013. However, he warned that Islamic State posed the biggest current threat to national security and it would last a generation.

'Together with MI6, GCHQ and the police, MI5 has disrupted 12 plots in the UK since June 2013,' said Mr Parker.

'ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant) is an enduring threat, here to stay, and is at least a generational challenge. MI5 and the intelligence agencies have good defences because of the investment made in our capabilities. We will find and stop most attempts to attack us, but not all.'

In a keynote speech at the Royal Society he said MI5's technological expertise 'makes it less likely people will be killed by terrorism or our secrets will be stolen'.

His speech came just hours after Britain's counter-terrorism police chief warned of the threat of a Paris-style gun rampage in Britain as he said half of the terror plots foiled involved suspects trying to get guns. 

Mark Rowley said five plots uncovered in the past two years involved fanatics trying to amass machine guns and others firearms to launch an attack on our streets.

Assault weapons like the ones used in the Paris massacre last November are being smuggled into Britain by criminal gangs from the Balkans and Eastern Europe and could be sold on to terrorists, he said. 

Sharia UK: British Gymnastics suspends Olympic medalist for 2 months for insulting Islam

$
0
0
This despite Smith’s having visited a mosque and issued numerous groveling apologies. Do you think he would have received this suspension if he had been perceived as having insulted any other group? Neither do I. But in Britain today, and all over the West, Sharia blasphemy laws forbidding criticism of Islam coalesce nicely with the initiative to ban “hate speech” against supposedly vulnerable minorities. The freedom of speech is far more severely threatened than most people realize.
louis-smith
“Louis Smith: British Gymnastics bans four-time Olympic medallist over video,” BBC, November 1, 2016
Four-time Olympic medallist Louis Smith has been suspended for two months by British Gymnastics over a video in which he appeared to mock Islam.
The video, filmed by Smith but leaked to the media, appeared to show him laughing while retired gymnast Luke Carson mimicked Islamic prayer practices.
Smith, who won pommel horse silver at Rio 2016, later said he was “deeply sorry” for his “thoughtless actions”.
Carson was given a reprimand.Smith, 27, is one of Britain’s best known gymnasts and won the BBC show Strictly Come Dancing in 2012.
“It is regrettable that following a historic summer of achievement, the organisation finds itself in this difficult position with two high-profile members in breach of our standards of conduct,” British Gymnastics chief executive Jane Allen said.
“As the custodians of the integrity and values of the sport, we have had no choice but to act responsibly.
“Whilst both individuals showed remorse following the incident, we hope in the future they use their profile to have a positive impact on sport and communities.”

British Gymnastics said Smith’s ban was a “cumulative penalty” because of a previous breach of its rules on conduct.

He was reprimanded in June for posting an image on social media of an American gymnast, who was 16 when the photograph was taken, accompanied by a comment British Gymnastics said was “unbefitting to a participant”.In April, he apologised for questioning the judging at the British Championships, where he was beaten to pommel gold by Max Whitlock.

The Briton missed last month’s Olympic and Paralympic celebrations for Britain’s Rio 2016 medallists to visit two London mosques “to learn more about the Muslim community”.Smith said he had previously been “ignorant to people’s religion” and added on Facebook that it was his responsibility “as someone of sporting influence” to exercise freedom of speech “in good taste”….

Je suis Louis Smith: why we must be free to mock Islam

Somali sex gang who groomed, raped and subjected vulnerable British schoolgirls as young as 14 to 'violent and horrible' abuse are jailed for 32 years

$
0
0
  • Three Somali men jailed for 32 years for raping and sexually abusing girls
  • Sakariya Sheikh, Mohammed Dahir and Abdirashid Abdulahi jailed today
  • Court heard girls were plied with drugs and booze before being 'pestered'
  • Rapes became 'routine' and men regarded some victims as 'cheap & easy'
Three members of a Somali sex gang who trafficked, raped and subjected vulnerable British schoolgirls to 'violent and horrible' abuse have been jailed for 32 years.

Girls as young as 14 were plied with drugs and alcohol before being 'pestered again and again' for sex by the men who operated in inner city Bristol.

Bristol Crown Court heard the rapes became 'routine' and the men regarded some of the victims, who cannot be named for legal reasons, as 'cheap and easy'.

Sakariya Sheikh, 23, was jailed for 16 years at Bristol Crown Court for three sexual assaults, two counts of trafficking for sexual exploitation, rape and supplying a class B drug
Mohammed Dahir, 24, was jailed for eight years for two counts of rape
Sakariya Sheikh, 23,  was jailed for 16 years at Bristol Crown Court for three sexual assaults, two counts of trafficking for sexual 
exploitation, rape and supplying a class B drug. Meanwhile, Mohammed Dahir, 24,  was jailed for eight years for two counts of rape

Seven Somali men went on trial at the beginning of September accused of 46 charges in connection with the sex ring, who preyed on girls from a range of different backgrounds and ethnicities.

Three of the men - Sakariya Sheikh, 23, Mohammed Dahir, 24, and Abdirashid Abdulahi, 23 – have now been convicted of 14 charges, including trafficking, sexual assault and rape.

Sheikh was jailed for 16 years after being found guilty of three sexual assaults, two counts of trafficking for sexual exploitation, rape and supplying a class B drug.

Both Dahir and Abdulahi were convicted of two counts of rape each and jailed for eight years.

Sentencing them, Judge Peter Blair QC said: 'You have brought shame upon your families and upon yourselves.

'You are not worthy of very much further attention in this court room. My attention is focused upon the victims of your crimes.

'They were four children trying to find their way in life, some of them struggling with difficult issues at home.

'You used your older age, your personal freedom and your relative stronger power to manipulate and coerce them into becoming for you little more than objects to satisfy you sexually.'

Abdirashid Abdulahi, 23, was jailed for eight years at Bristol court for two counts of rape
Abdirashid Abdulahi, 23, was jailed for eight years at Bristol court for two counts of rape
The judge described the consequences of the abuse on the victims as 'disastrous'.

'You made them feel worthless, dirty, unloved,' he told the defendants.

'Their pain goes on and so it will for you now. They are at long last receiving some measure of justice from your convictions. 

Their very brave and difficult decision to give evidence against you has been vindicated and I pay tribute to them.'

The trial, codenamed Operation Button, was the third in a series of prosecutions of Somali men for child sexual exploitation and drugs offences.

In two earlier trials in 2014, codenamed Operation Brooke, 14 men were jailed for more than 100 years.

The three convicted defendants in Operation Button - Sheikh and Abdulahi and Dahir - were also found guilty in Operation Brooke.

The case follows similar exploitation of girls across English towns and cities such as Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and Telford.

During the trial, the jury heard that in March 2013 a 15-year-old girl was simultaneously raped by Sheikh and another man at a flat in Bristol.

The majority of the offences happened between 2011 and 2012 against girls who had travelled to Bristol by train to meet the men.

Anna Vigars, prosecuting, said the victims 'suffered sexual abuse, some of it violent, degrading and horrible, some of it less so'.

Eleven of the convicted charges - including eight rapes - related to one victim.

'These men exploited her vulnerability and her longing to be wanted, they had sex with her as much as they wanted to,' Mrs Vigars said.

'They had no interest in whether she got anything out of it or what she wanted. They wanted sex and didn't consider whether she was consenting or not.

'It was about power and control and exploitation of her vulnerability.'

In total, seven men went on trial accused of 46 charges. The men were Sheikh, Dahir and Abdulahi, as well as Abdirahman Galal, 26, Mohammed Osman, 29, Nuridin Mohamoud, 22, and Nasir Mahamoud, 23.

Mohamoud was acquitted of the two charges he faced; Galal was acquitted of one charge and the jury could not reach verdicts on two further charges; Osman was acquitted of three charges and the jury was unable to reach verdicts on three charges and Nasir Mahamoud was acquitted of one charge and the jury could not reach verdicts on three charges.

Sheikh was convicted of 10 charges, acquitted of six and the jury did not reach verdicts on three charges. He previously admitted two charges of supplying cannabis.

Dahir was found guilty of two charges, acquitted of three and the jury could not reach verdicts on three charges.

Meanwhile, Abdulahi was convicted of two charges, acquitted of one and no verdict could be reached on a further charge.

'IT WAS EXPECTED OF ME': RAPE VICTIM TELLS COURT 

During the seven-week trial at Bristol Crown Court, one victim described how she was raped by different men.

The girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, told the court she felt 'pressurised' into having sex with the men and believed it was 'expected' of her.

She said the incidents happened when she was aged 14 or 15 and took place during visits to Bristol in 2012 and 2013.

Jurors found Sakariya Sheikh, 23, known as 'Zak'; Mohammed Dahir, 24, known as 'Kamal'; and Abdirashid Abdulahi, 23, known as 'Abs' or 'Older Abs' all guilty of raping her.

Other men were acquitted or the jury failed to reach verdicts.

Her allegations formed 32 of the 46 charges the defendants faced on the indictment and included rape, sexual assault, false imprisonment and trafficking within the UK for sexual exploitation.

The teenager told the jury that she would be given alcohol or drugs during visits to various homes in the Bristol area and then would be raped by the men.

Asked why she had sex with Dahir, the girl replied: 'Because I was at his house. It was expected of me.

'They would keep on asking me and they would give me stuff like weed and shisha and alcohol and I felt I had to do it or they would eject me from the house.'

Referring to another rape by Dahir, the girl told the jury: 'I told him I didn't want to do it but he didn't seem to want to listen to me.'

The girl also described being raped by Sheikh and another man, and told the court: 'I just lied down and let it carry on and let them finish.'

She told the jury she did not consider herself to be in a relationship with any of the men she accused of raping her.

'A lot of the time they kept on asking me, they would keep on asking me, so in the end I gave in,' she said.

'A lot of the time it was expected of me by the person whose flat I was in or by my friend as, if I didn't, she would no longer get stuff off them like alcohol and weed.'
The judge ruled that charges should be stayed where the jury could not reach verdicts for defendants without convictions. 

Such charges for defendants convicted of offences were ordered to lie on file.

The defendants denied all the charges. Some claimed they did not know the girls or said they had been wrongly identified.

Speaking after the case, Detective Sergeant Lisa Jones, of Avon and Somerset Police, said: 'These defendants befriended these vulnerable young people who were still at school, grooming and sexually exploiting them. 

'Their systematic abuse over a number of years slowly eroded their confidence and made them think these crimes were normal behaviour.

The men gave no thought to the long-term pain and torment they were inflicting on them.

'It is impossible to comprehend the torment and anguish these girls have suffered at the hands of these offenders. 

They are on a journey of coming to terms with this abuse and I have no doubt this will be a life-long journey.

'The offenders have also refused to take any responsibility for these truly despicable crimes, forcing all of their victims to relive their ordeal by giving evidence at the trial. 

Their bravery and determination has ensured our communities will now be protected from these dangerous offenders.'

A series case review published in March found that the gang was able to continue the systematic abuse due to failings by social services, police and doctors.

Cuts left the police so stretched it took six months to launch an investigation, during which time the girls were passed around for 'horrific' sexual exploitation.

Some officers were so busy they had 100 crimes waiting to be reviewed in their inbox, the review of the investigation - Operation Brooke - revealed.

The delays meant the men were free to abuse their nine victims undetected, subjecting them to ordeals 'beyond most people's comprehension'.

Victims were blamed by police for their 'lifestyle choices' and one was told she had 'brought it all on herself' after she reported two rapes.

Meanwhile, contraception was dished out to girls as young as 12, who went to their GPs complaining of heavy bleeding, abdominal pains and needing tests for STDs.

Schools also 'struggled to distinguish between disruptive behaviour and early signs of vulnerability', meaning abused pupils were excluded rather than being cared for.

This was often because confusing national guidance meant professionals got 'hung up' on patient confidentiality and failed to share vital details and concerns.

Huw Rogers, Head of the Complex Casework Unit for CPS South West, described the crimes against the girls - many of whom were in care - as 'chilling'.

He said: 'The victims were deliberately targeted as they were perceived to be vulnerable and impressionable.

'The defendants' relationships with the victims focused on complete control, ensuring they were always in charge.

'They wanted sex from the girls and demanded this from them.

'The victims did not have the freedom to consent to any of these acts, and on some occasions were threatened so that they could not leave.'

The report, commissioned by the Bristol Safeguarding Children Board, said that while some of the victims are now recovering, others continue to lead 'abusive and traumatic lives'.

After the review was published, Assistant Chief Constable Kay Wozniak said: 'We recognise that there were shortcomings.

'Unfortunately, financial pressures continue not just in Avon and Somerset but across the country.' 

OPERATION BUTTON: THE DEFENDANTS AND CHARGE SHEET

Here is a list of the defendants and the charges they faced during the trial at Bristol Crown Court.
Sakariya Sheikh, 23, aka 'Zak', faced a total of 19 charges against seven girls. He was found guilty of three sexual assaults against three girls, four rapes against a fourth girl, two of trafficking and one of aiding and abetting rape. The jury acquitted him of four sexual assaults and two rapes. They failed to reach verdicts on another charge of sexual assault and two rapes.

Abdirahman Galal, 26, aka 'Ramsey', was found not guilty of two rapes. The jury failed to reach a verdict on a third rape charge.

Mohammed Osman, 26, aka 'I-Man', was acquitted of three rape charges. The jury failed to reach verdicts on two further charges of rape and one of sexual assault.

Mohammed Dahir, 24, aka 'Kamal', was found guilty of two rapes and acquitted of a further three. The jury failed to reach verdicts on two charges of rape and a charge of aiding and abetting rape.

Nuridin Mohamoud, 22, aka 'Ahmed', was found not guilty of one charge of false imprisonment and one charge of rape against one girl.

Abdirashid Abdulahi, 23, aka 'Abs' or 'Older Abs', was found guilty of raping one girl twice and acquitted of a third charge against her. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on a fourth rape charge against her.

Nasir Mahamoud, 23, aka 'Ace', was found not guilty of rape against one girl. The jury failed to reach verdicts on three other rape charges against the same girl.  


'Go away, you shouldn't be here. Don't come back':

$
0
0
  • There are almost no white residents to be found in Savile Town, Yorkshire 
  • Last census found only 48 of 4,033 people living there were white British
  • Even lady selling ice cream from a van during the summer wears a burka
From the window of her flat overlooking the canal path in a suburb of Dewsbury in Yorkshire, a blonde woman watches two female figures walking past as they chatter in a foreign tongue.

Both the passers-by are covered in black Islamic gowns, only a glimpse of their eyes show from the 2 in gap in the veils across their faces.

They, like many Muslim women who live here, speak little or no English. Lots of them will have no contact with any person from another religion or culture. 

Almost all have been brought to the UK to wed the British men of south Asian heritage who have made this area their home.

Even the lady selling ice creams from a van during the summer wears a burka in Savile Town
Even the lady selling ice creams from a van during the summer wears a burka in Savile Town

The wives have restricted lives: bringing up children, cooking for families, or going to women-only events at the huge local mosque run by the Deobandis, a powerful sect of Islam whose most outspoken preachers have urged followers not to mix with Christians, Jews or Hindus.

We are in Savile Town, one of the most racially homogeneous parts of Britain: not because everyone is an indigenous Yorkshire man or woman, but exactly the opposite.

n fact there are almost no white residents to be found in Savile Town. Astonishingly, a detailed breakdown of the last census of 2011 recorded that only 48 of the 4,033 people living here were white British.

This would not surprise the blonde Lorraine Matthews, looking out at the ladies in burkas from her window. 

She is a 53-year-old dentist's receptionist, one of the handful of white Britons left in Savile Town's grid of terrace streets. Almost all the other residents, according to that census, have Pakistani or Indian backgrounds.

Their forebears were enticed to Savile Town as cheap labour for back-breaking jobs in the woollen mills which had made Dewsbury a renowned textile town.

A detailed breakdown of the last census of 2011 recorded that only 48 of the 4,033 people living in Savile Town were white British
A detailed breakdown of the last census of 2011 recorded that only 48 of the 4,033 people living in Savile Town were white British
For however unpalatable it may be to British liberals, the fact is that many Muslims here only want to live with those from their own culture
For however unpalatable it may be to British liberals, the fact is that many Muslims here only want to live with those from their own culture

These hard-working newcomers bought their own homes, and opened corner shops that sold burkas, prayer mats and perfumes that contained no alcohol, in line with the strictures of the Koran.

Soon the new arrivals had built the mosque which is designed to accommodate 4,000 worshippers. 

Today, a Sharia court nearby — criticised in a House of Lords report for discriminating against women in divorce and matrimonial disputes — does brisk business espousing the strict Islamic justice code.

Even the lady selling ice creams from a van during the summer wears a burka, and the mobile butcher going round the streets offers only halal goat, lamb and ostrich.

Stand in Savile Town, as I have, and you will see scores of boys in Islamic robes walking to and from lessons at the mosque's madrasah school, where for hours at a time they rote-learn the Koran by heart.

And, distressingly, every girl I saw — even those of six and seven playing in the park — was wrapped up in a hijab and shoulder-to-toe-gown lest a man glimpse her flesh.

Eight of the nine pubs in the area have shut because there are hardly any local customers who drink alcohol. The hair salon, once giving stern perms to Yorkshire ladies, closed down long ago, the Western grocery and clothes shops, too.

Needless to say, with nowhere to socialise or shop for what they like, the local white folk departed, first in a trickle, then a torrent.

Savile Town is one of the most racially homogeneous parts of Britain: not because everyone is an indigenous Yorkshire man or woman, but exactly the opposite
Savile Town is one of the most racially homogeneous parts of Britain: not because everyone is an indigenous Yorkshire man or woman, but exactly the opposite

Savile Town was left to become an ethnic enclave. And it seems that this detachment from mainstream society had disturbing repercussions. 

For this small area has produced several young jihadists who disappeared to fight — and die as suicide bombers — for Islamic State in the Middle East.

(Mohammed Sidique Khan, the leader of the bombers who attacked London on July 7, 2005, was brought up nearby. 

He bade farewell to his pregnant wife at their terrace house before leading his fellow attackers to the capital to claim 52 innocent lives in explosions on Tube trains and buses.)

Life in Savile Town was investigated earlier this year by Owen Bennett-Jones, the BBC's former Pakistan correspondent, who threw light on the influence of the Deobandi movement over the Muslim population here.

Interviewed for the Radio 4 programme was Mufti Mohammed Pandor, a civil servant and spokesman for the Deobandis. He arrived from India's Gujarat in 1964 as a small child with his family.

The streets of the Savile Town area of Dewsbury, which since the 1950's has seen its white population almost entirely replaced
The streets of the Savile Town area of Dewsbury, which since the 1950's has seen its white population almost entirely replaced

He lives near Savile Town, and would call himself a British Muslim. Yet he refused to let interviewer Bennett-Jones see his wife when the reporter visited the couple's home, although she was permitted to make the tea in the kitchen.

Pandor insists she is completely covered at almost all times, allowing her only to raise her veil for passport checks at airports.

 His family rarely watches British TV and says all music is un-Islamic.

Despite being a religious adviser to two universities — Bradford and Huddersfield — he told the BBC that Muslim men should only be permitted to enter higher education institutions to study and pray, and 'not to look at women'.

'If Mohammed did not do it, we don't do it,' Pandor told the BBC, saying the Deobandi are a 'back to basics' movement whose followers live in the style of the Prophet's life, 14 centuries ago.

You might dismiss such desperately backward thinking as being the preserve of a small outlandish sect, but the Deobandis run nearly half the 1,600 registered UK mosques, and train 80 per cent of all domestic Islamic clerics who, in turn, play a huge part in influencing the growing population of British Muslims.

Perhaps it's little surprise that the few indigenous Yorkshire people remaining in Savile Town feel somewhat beleaguered.

Lorraine Matthews, in the house near the canal, is outspoken in her comments about the community in which she now lives: 'I wouldn't go out at night on my own as it is dangerous if you're not from the Muslim community

. It isn't sensible for a woman to walk there after dark.

 The Asian lads gather on the corners, they make you feel intimidated because they don't respect white women.'

Yorkshire-born Jean Wood, 76, (pictured) a church-goer, is one long-time resident who feels that she is being edged out
Yorkshire-born Jean Wood, 76, (pictured) a church-goer, is one long-time resident who feels that she is being edged out

When I myself walked down South Street towards the mosque, figures in burkas peered out of their lace-curtained windows in surprise at seeing an uncovered woman's face.

I asked one tall teenager, wearing an Islamic cap and white robes over his jeans, for directions to the mosque entrance. His response was to spit at me and shout: 'Go away, you shouldn't be here. Don't come back.'

It is depressing to be confronted with such aggression. And I've no doubt many Muslims, too, will feel distressed at such behaviour.

 Not all British followers of Islam wish to live in areas where people of other faiths or cultures might fear to tread.

Yet in places such as Savile Town, the omens are not good.

For however unpalatable it may be to British liberals, the fact is that many Muslims here only want to live with those from their own culture.

Indeed, some of the few remaining non-Muslim residents say they are regularly targeted by members of the local Islamic community who want to buy their houses.

Not all British followers of Islam wish to live in areas where people of other faiths or cultures might fear to tread
Not all British followers of Islam wish to live in areas where people of other faiths or cultures might fear to tread

Some have even received a knock on the door from complete strangers in religious robes offering wads of cash in plastic bags to purchase their homes.

Yorkshire-born Jean Wood, 76, a church-goer, is one long-time resident who feels that she is being edged out. Her children beg her to move to an area where she can share her retirement with the kind of people she grew up with.

At her neat home on the edge of Savile Town, she told me the tale of what happened a day after her husband died suddenly while sitting at the kitchen table.

'He had not gone 24 hours when a Muslim neighbour pushed a note through the door saying she wanted to buy this house,' she remembers. 'We had lived here all our married life. I was grieving, although the note did not mention my loss.

'But I gathered my strength. I phoned the number on the piece of paper and said my home was not for sale and never would be in my lifetime.'

They were brave words, but — inevitably — the Deobandis' spokesman Mufti Pandor views it differently.

He described, on Radio 4, how 'white flight' ensued when his family came to Savile Town. 'Who was going to buy the house next door to us?' said Pandor.

 'It certainly wasn't going to be a white guy . . . so my uncle bought it. Then there were two of us. So then guess what happened? The bloke opposite said: 'Bugger this, I'm going'— so he left.'

It's not hard to see why, with suspicions running deep on both sides of the cultural divide, Savile Town is, for good or bad, changing for ever.

Ghetto Britain: Entire districts are segregated, warns report, as it urges school intakes to be mixed
By Steve Doughty 

Entire districts of British cities are becoming racially segregated as white populations move out and the proportion of ethnic minorities increases, a major report said yesterday.

The study, by Professor Ted Cantle, said cities were suffering from deepening polarisation between white and minority groups that had gone largely unnoticed by academics and politicians.

Professor Cantle named Slough, Birmingham, Leicester, Luton, Bradford and a series of London boroughs as ‘areas with an increasingly dwindling white British population and growing minorities’.

Picture of Britain: This is the white British population by percentage in towns and cities in 2001 and then 2011, based on census figures
Picture of Britain: This is the white British population by percentage in towns and cities in 2001 and then 2011, based on census figures
Mohammed Tabrez Noorji, who runs his own butcher shop in Blackburn, Lancashire, admits he has never served a white Briton
Mohammed Tabrez Noorji, who runs his own butcher shop in Blackburn, Lancashire, admits he has never served a white Briton

He said that census returns for small areas of cities showed that some were even ‘tending more towards ghettoisation’.

Professor Cantle, the investigator called in by Tony Blair in 2001 to head an inquiry into race riots across northern cities, described the effect as the ‘growing isolation of the white majority from minorities in urban zones’.

His report also:

  • Called for concerted state action to reverse segregation. This included the suggestion that white pupils should be diverted to schools in districts with greater ethnic minority populations;

  • Said the Government needed to do more to encourage white British residents to remain in diverse areas;

  • Found that the proportion of white British people living in certain parts of the country – such as Birmingham, Luton, Bradford and Blackburn – has declined significantly in the past 20 years. The proportion of minorities in some parts of Bradford was more than 97 per cent.

Professor Cantle’s report – which attracted backing from prominent Labour figures – did not use the American phrase ‘white flight’ to describe the departure of white residents from cities and suburbs.

US POLICY TO END SEGREGATION THAT FAILED TO BRING DOWN BARRIERS

In an attempt to end racial segregation and improve the prospects of black pupils, US schools were forced to adopt the hugely controversial policy that became known as busing.
A series of court judgments in the 1960s allowed cities to insist that pupils attend schools far from their own districts and suburbs.
‘Forced busing’ became a means of shipping pupils to schools where it was considered they would improved the ethnic mix and the quality of education.
The policy proved hugely unpopular. White parents demonstrated in many cities, notably in Boston. There were complaints from white parents that children were being moved to dangerous areas, and that long periods spent on the buses harmed their education.
Black parents were no more impressed: discipline in schools where students were bused in was often said to have deteriorated rather than improved, and parents were not convinced that their children’s education would be better simply because they were sitting next to a white pupil.
By the 1980s is was largely accepted that the policy had failed and gradually it was phased out.
However, it said it was clear that there had been a ‘decline of the white British population in those towns and cities in absolute numbers and relative to the increase in minorities in the same areas.

‘This results in a growing isolation of the white majority from minorities in urban zones.’

The Cantle analysis used the word ‘ghetto’ to describe the way some parts of British cities have developed. It said that while there was no accepted definition of a ghetto, many agreed it meant areas where minority groups made up 90 per cent of the population, or 80 per cent where a single group was dominant.

The report’s demand for state-directed desegregation echoes the controversial attempts to reverse racial division made by American cities in the late 20th century, known as ‘busing’.

Professor Cantle, who after the 2001 riots warned that populations in northern cities were living ‘parallel lives’, produced the report, Is Segregation Increasing In The UK?, with Professor Eric Kaufmann of Birkbeck College.
It was time for the Government to move in to stop the spread of ethnic division, said Professor Cantle, who runs the iCoCo community cohesion foundation.

 ‘This has gone under the radar, but it is time this became a national priority because cohesion is at stake,’ he said.

‘The focus of policy needs to shift, this is not just about minorities – politicians and policy-makers need to encourage white British residents to remain in diverse areas; to choose, rather than avoid, diverse areas when they do re-locate, encouraging similar choices with respect to placing pupils in diverse schools; in other words to create a positive choice for mixed areas and a shared society.’

The call for state intervention was backed by senior Labour figure Chuka Umunna. The MP for Streatham said: ‘Integration is a two-way street and all parts of society have a role to play in preventing the UK becoming more fragmented.’

 The report gives no indication of what policies might be adopted to persuade whites to remain or move into minority areas, to help minority families move into predominantly white areas, or to persuade parents to send their children to ‘diverse’ schools.

Professor Cantle’s analysis said that in a number of towns there has been ‘outward movement of white British population and an increase in the minority population because of natural factors or inward migration’.

The report adds: ‘Given that the polarisation of wards has been evident since at least 1991 and has been increasing, it is likely that this will continue as the minority population continues to grow and the majority continues to relocate.’


muslim fifa women wants to ban poppy

$
0
0
  • FA tonight said they will defy FIFA's ban on poppies during Scotland game
  • England and Scotland could now face fines or even points deductions
  • PM Theresa May had described decision by FIFA as 'utterly outrageous' 
  • FA chairman Greg Clarke insisted 'there will be poppies' at Wembley 
  • Decision comes after official enforcing the ban - Fatma Samoura - claimed 'Britain is not only country that has been suffering from the result of war'
England and Scotland footballers will wear the poppy during their Armistice Day clash in defiance of an 'utterly outrageous ban' imposed by world football chiefs. 

Amid mounting public fury over an attempt by FIFA to stop the national team honouring the war dead next Friday, both sides tonight took the unprecedented step of announcing they would ignore attempts to suppress them.  

The world football governing body's rules prohibit political, religious or commercial messages on shirts. 

But the FA said the poppy did not fit any of those categories and will therefore flout FIFA's rules.

The decision comes after the FIFA official enforcing the ban - Senegalese bureaucrat Fatma Samoura - claimed 'Britain is not the only country that has been suffering from the result of war'.

FA bosses have said they will defy FIFA's ban on poppies at Remembrance Day by wearing black armbands with with poppies on
FA bosses have said they will defy FIFA's ban on poppies at Remembrance Day by wearing black armbands with with poppies on
FA bosses have said they will defy FIFA's ban on poppies at Remembrance Day by wearing black armbands with with poppies on (similar to in 2011, pictured right) 

Football Association chief executive Martin Glenn said both FAs will defy the ban and accept any punishment. 

Both teams have decided to follow the same path as 2011 when England players wore armbands with the poppy symbol during a match against Spain.   

Mr Glenn told the BBC the FA's legal position is watertight and FIFA had misinterpreted the regulations.

Shortly after, the Scottish FA said it intended to 'pay appropriate tribute to those who have made the ultimate sacrifice' by having players wearing black armbands bearing poppies.

FIFA general secretary Fatma Samba Diouf Samoura said 'any kind of sanction' could now follow.

This could include hefty fines or even a points deduction in their bids to reach the World Cup in Russia.  

Earlier today, Prime Minister Theresa May condemned FIFA over the 'utterly outrageous' ban, telling the scandal-hit body to get its own house in order before telling others what to do.

FIFA Secretary General Fatma Samoura claimed 'Britain is not the only country that has been suffering from the result of war'
FIFA Secretary General Fatma Samoura claimed 'Britain is not the only country that has been suffering from the result of war'
Samoura was brought in by new FIFA president Gianni Infantino despite question marks over whether she had the experience for the job
Samoura was brought in by new FIFA president Gianni Infantino despite question marks over whether she had the experience for the job

THE FA STATEMENT IN FULL

We fully respect the laws of the game and take our founding role on the International Football Association Board extremely seriously. The poppy is an important symbol of remembrance and we do not believe it represents a political, religious or commercial message, nor does it relate to any one historical event.
In keeping with the position agreed with FIFA back in 2011 and in what we believe is in accordance with Law 4, para 4, The FA intend to pay appropriate tribute to those who have made the ultimate sacrifice by having the England team wear black armbands bearing poppies in our fixture on Armistice Day.
FA chairman Greg Clarke had also insisted 'there will be poppies at Wembley'.

He said: 'We're balancing respect for the fallen and their families. We're negotiating in good faith with FIFA to try and find a solution'. 

However in a sneering attack earlier today, FIFA's newly appointed Secretary General Samoura said: 'Britain is not the only country that has been suffering from the result of war. 

'Syria is an example.

 My own continent has been torn by war for years.

 And the only question is why are we doing exceptions for just one country and not the rest of the world? 

'When asked if the teams could be punished for defying the ban, she said: 'It is not really my ambition to punish anybody. 

They just have to recognise themselves that they are part of the rules of the game and they should be ready to face any kind of sanctions or measures.' 

Samoura is expected to meet representatives from the English FA at Wembley tomorrow and may also be involved in talks with both the Scottish and Welsh FAs.

Samoura, a married mother-of-three, sparked anger among some in FIFA when she was parachuted into the £1million-a-year role by the organisation's new Swiss president Gianni Infantino in May.

She was handed the Secretary General position despite having no real experience in handling sport, having previously worked in a humanitarian role at the UN.

The 54-year-old's appointment came as FIFA desperately tried to rescue its damaged reputation, after a number of former officials were arrested on corruption charges and former president Sepp Blatter was placed under criminal investigation.

There was also widespread anger at the organisation for awarding the 2022 World Cup to the tiny oil-rich country of Qatar amid allegations of bribery.

Appointing Samoura to the role, Infantino insisted she understood 'transparency and accountability' and praised her 'experience and vision'.  

Fatma Samoura talking earlier this month about FIFA caring
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time0:31
Fullscreen
Need Text
England players (in 2011) with poppies on their shirts -  they will do so again next Friday
England players (in 2011) with poppies on their shirts -  they will do so again next Friday

Samoura, who has a degree in English and Spanish from the University of Lyon, started working for the UN's Food Programme in 1995. 

She was later sent around the world to work for the organisation before becoming a humanitarian administrator in Nigeria.

The English and Scottish FA will now find out what sanction they can expect having chosen to flout the ban on poppies.

Separately, the FA of Wales has also written to FIFA requesting permission to wear poppies on armbands during their game against Serbia in Cardiff on 12 November. 

Samoura has previously worked in administrative roles for the UN
Samoura has previously worked in administrative roles for the UN
Responding to the row at Prime Minister's Questions today, Theresa May tore into football's governing body.

She said: 'I think the stance that has been taken by FIFA is utterly outrageous.

'Our football players want to recognise and respect those who have given their lives for our safety and security. I think it is absolutely right that they should be able to do so.' 

And in a direct message to world football's governing body, which has been plagued by corruption allegations, she said: 'Before they start telling us what to do, they jolly well ought to sort their own house out.'

Responding to that, Samoura said: 'I would just ask anybody to refrain from political interference.' 


Former RAF pilot and prisoner of war John Nichol, who set up the petition, said: 'The poppy is not a political statement at all. It could not be further from a political statement.

'It is a statement of remembrance and an acknowledgement of sacrifice from the First World War right through to the sacrifices of our young men and women today.'

In Parliament today, PM Theresa May branded the poppy ban 'utterly outrageous'

IRELAND GOT AWAY WITH EASTER RISING TRIBUTE

The Republic of Ireland football team were this year allowed to wear shirts marking the 100th anniversary of the Easter Rising.
Players had ‘1916’, the year of the rebellion, embroidered on their shirts for two warm-up matches against Switzerland and Slovakia around the Easter weekend ahead of the Euro 2016 tournament.
There was no sanction from FIFA on this occasion because its rules and regulations do not cover ‘friendly’ fixtures.
But the decision to wear the jerseys caused controversy among some Unionists in Northern Ireland when it was announced by the Football Association of Ireland.
The 1916 Easter Rising resulted in more than 450 deaths.
Mr Nichol said many service personnel were football fans, and the match was an opportunity for the country to show 'how much we as a society care about the work these heroes do'.

He added: 'No-one should ever be banned from wearing a poppy and it brings shame on FIFA that they continue to propagate this misunderstanding of our heritage.'

Damian Collins, chairman of the Commons Sports Committee, said the ban was insulting to British fans.

England's rugby and cricket teams are facing no opposition from their world governing bodies over wearing poppies on the shirts for their next internationals during the Remembrance period in November honouring the war dead. 

He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'I hope common sense prevails. FIFA has strict rules banning political, religious or commercial symbols from shirts. I think it is insulting to people in this country to say a poppy is one of those sort of symbols.

'Someone has shared with me on social media an Ireland football shirt that has a special embroidery on marking the centenary of the Easter Rising.

'FIFA allow that, so I think people will find it astonishing that the poppy's not allowed.'

Fans are furious that the ban will prevent the players from remembering the war dead
Fans are furious that the ban will prevent the players from remembering the war dead

Condemning FIFA's stance, former culture, media, and sport secretary John Whittingdale told BBC Radio 5 Live: 'For them to try and brand the poppy as a political symbol shows a total misunderstanding, and I think there are a number of reasons why we are already profoundly unhappy with FIFA's behaviour and conduct and this adds to that list.'

Asked if the teams should risk a points loss, Mr Whittingdale replied: 'Yes.'  

A FIFA spokesman told MailOnline: 'FIFA fully respects the significance of commemorating Remembrance Day . The relevant Law 4 clearly states that the players should not carry any political, religious or commercial messages.

'The laws are applied uniformly in the event of similar requests by any member association to commemorate similar historical events.' 


Muslim leader says Muslims have “right” to use Sharia law in Britain

$
0
0
“All that it is, you have these private and independent institutions arise from different minority communities, Sharia councils and Beit Din in the Jewish community, which are basically people who want to enact their right to religious life without interference from secularists.”
In saying this, al-Andalusi ignores the problem with Sharia courts entirely: Sharia councils are not equivalent to Beit Din in the Jewish community because Sharia, unlike Jewish law, asserts authority over unbelievers, as well as authority for governance. Moreover, with its sanction of wife-beating (Qur’an 4:34), devaluing of women’s testimony (Qur’an 2:282) and inheritance rights (Qur’an 4:11), allowance for polygamy (Qur’an 4:3), mandate of warfare against and subjugation of unbelievers (Qur’an 9:29), Sharia is incompatible with secular legal systems in numerous ways. Britain is in denial about that, as is the rest of the West. But sooner or later it will be quite painfully obvious to everyone.
Abdullah_al_Andalusi
“Muslims ‘have the RIGHT to use Sharia law in Britain’, says Islamic activist,” by Joe Barnes, Express, November 3, 2016:
AN ISLAMIC activist has claimed that Muslims have the right to use Sharia law and branded the Government’s inquiry into the matter as an “interference”.
Dr Ahmad al-Dubayan, chairman of the UK Board of Sharia Councils – a body set up to standardise the administration of Islamic law – said unregulated Sharia law courts exist “everywhere in the country”.
He told the Home Affairs Select Committee, on Tuesday, that the self-appointed courts are performing marriages and handing out divorces.
Although the unregulated bodies have no legal force or jurisdiction in the UK, they are regularly used by Muslim families to adjudicate on personal matters, the Committee heard….
He said: “We don’t know how many councils there are.
“Some people talk about 80 or 30 or 50, I don’t know. There is no record for this and no studies, unfortunately.”
He added that he could think of only two or three cases which had been unfair to women out of “hundreds” handled by Sharia councils.
The Select Committee heard that if Sharia courts are banned, backstreet courts will continue to operate but will slip even further under the radar.
Labour MP Naz Shah, who also giving evidence, admitted the councils could be used to “oppress” women.
She added: “Sharia itself is actually a code of conduct and the fundamental principal of Sharia is that the law of the land proceeds anything.
“You cannot enforce and have a second parallel legal system in this country.
“As a British lawmaker I’m very clear, we have one law and that law is of the British court.”
Abdullah al-Andalusi, co-founder of The Muslim Debate Initiative hit out at the Committee’s inquiry, claiming the “private or independent” bodies have the right to operate in Britain without “interference”.
Speaking on Sky News, he said: “All I would say is all this really amounts to is interference by a supposedly neutral body – the UK Government – into people’s religion and private affairs….
“All that it is, you have these private and independent institutions arise from different minority communities, Sharia councils and Beit Din in the Jewish community, which are basically people who want to enact their right to religious life without interference from secularists.”

Labour MP Naz Shah, who also giving evidence, 

She added: “Sharia itself is actually a code of conduct and the fundamental principal of Sharia is that the law of the land proceeds anything.
“You cannot enforce and have a second parallel legal system in this country.
Dr Ahmad al-Dubayan, chairman of the UK Board of Sharia Councils – a body set up to standardise the administration of Islamic law – said 

He told the Home Affairs Select Committee, on Tuesday, that the self-appointed courts are performing marriages and handing out divorces.

Although the unregulated bodies have no legal force or jurisdiction in the UK, they are regularly used by Muslim families to adjudicate on personal matters, the Committee heard.

Many courts reportedly charge for their services, with fees for divorce proceedings often higher than British courts

Taxi driver jailed for sex attack on passenger - who he later called to beg for mercy

$
0
0

Zaharul Hoque's victim told a court she feared for her life when the driver dragged her back into the cab after dropping her outside her home

BPMZaharul Hoque
Zaharul Hoque
A taxi driver has been jailed after launching a terrifying sex attack on his passenger, before ringing her to beg for mercy.
Zaharul Hoque pulled the victim back into his cab and tried to make her perform a sex act.
But he later called to say sorry and urged her to “let me off this time”.
Hoque, of Castle Bromwich , was convicted of sexual assault last month, reports the Birmingham Mail.
Now the 47-year-old, who had not told his family why he was on trial, has been jailed for three years and ordered to register as a sex offender for life.
The victim previously told Warwick Crown Court she feared for her life when Hoque dragged her back into the cab after dropping her outside her home.
She said: “His hands were all over me.
“Next thing, he pushed me towards the taxi door, opened the door and I was inside.
“I was scared, I didn’t know whether he was going to rape me.
“I was thinking: ‘I don’t know if I’m going to end up in a ditch.’”
The victim escaped and called Atherstone Taxis, which employed Hoque, to report the attack.
The jury heard she then had the first of three calls from the driver, in which he pleaded: “I apologise. Do me a favour, don’t complain.
“I do apologise, I do apologise. Let me off this time.”
Her ordeal happened in April last year after Hoque collected her and a group of friends from a night out in Atherstone.
He later told police he had done nothing wrong and there had been just a hug and a kiss on the cheek when he dropped the victim off.
BPMWarwick Crown Court
Zaharul Hoque was sentenced at Warwick Crown Court
Hoque claimed she was lying about the attack and said he called her just once, to ask why she was making a complaint.
Giving evidence, Hoque continued to deny making more than one call and claimed the caller was not him.
After more than six hours, a jury convicted Hoque of sexual assault by a majority of ten to two.
Jurors cleared him of a second count of the same charge, involving an allegation he touched the victim’s leg.
Passing sentence, Judge Sylvia de Bertodano told Hoque: “You took advantage of her being on her own.
“You dragged her back into your taxi, and she thought you were going to rape her.
“She recorded it, and we could hear the recording in court.
“Afterwards she immediately made a complaint to the taxi office.
“You pestered her with calls not to go ahead with the case, and she had to come to court to give evidence.
“You have done everything in your power to get out of the consequences, even lying to the probation officer who prepared the pre-sentence report by giving her a different account.”
The judge said young women getting into taxis alone were “vulnerable” and needed to trust the driver.
She added: “If taxi drivers behave to female customers in this way, they will be very badly affected.
“In her [impact] statement she said she feels depressed and gets flashbacks.
“It is a serious ordeal going through it again in court. She is a very courageous young woman.
“I have read references which say you are a hard-working and respectable individual, but she saw a completely different side of you.”

Councils foot MASSIVE bill for more than 5,000 migrant children

$
0
0

CASH-STRAPPED councils are being forced to plug million-pound black holes left by the gap between what child migrants cost and what the Home Office provides.

Child migrants arrive in N Ireland
GETTY
The Home Office does not provide nearly enough fund to cope with the child refugees
Local authorities are paying out for care, immunisations, health checks, clothes and activities for teenagers coming over from Calais, while closing libraries, slashing creche hours and scrambling to save money after massive Tory cuts.
A report by the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS) has revealed councils are being forced to spend out on supporting teens after the Government's decision to take on more children from Calais.
According to the report the number of lone child migrants in England has more than doubled from 2,050 in March 2014 to 4,210 in March 2016.
The revealing dossier showed among the 106 authorities which responded to the ADCS, 5,673 children were supported by local authorities in England in 2015/16.
Currently, 92 percent of the migrants being looked after in England are male, and 76 percent are aged 16 or 17.
The news comes as many of the migrants arriving from Calais appeared to be older than they claimed.
Last year, there were 789 age disputes, compared to 318 in 2014. 
Councils told the ADCS the number of migrants lying about their age is rising.
It is now imperative that councils get a long-term funding arrangement
Cllr David Simmonds
Of this number two thirds were considered to be over the age of 18 when an assessment request was raised.
And the cost for the councils just keeps on rising.
The report states: "The result was overwhelming. 43 of 44 local authorities who answered this question felt that national funding was not sufficient, despite examples of robust action being taken to manage and reduce costs.
"Thirty-eight authorities described the gap as being of concern, but six added that the gap for care leavers who were Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children (UASC) was an even greater concern.”
Child migrants arrive in the UKGETTY
76 per cent of the child refugees coming to the UK are 16 or 17
Local authorities which responded explained they ended up caring for the children who arrived in their areas.
The report said: "The increasing number of new arrivals, when added to those already looked after, indicates a significant and cumulatively growing cohort.
"The most common way children end up in certain areas is what is referred to as the ‘lorry stop lottery’.”
The daily rates for UASC taken into care before 1st July 2016 are £95 for under 16 year olds and £71 for 16-17 year olds.
After July 1 this figure goes up to £114 for under 16s and £91 for 16 and 17 year olds.
One authority estimated the shortfall in funding at £60,000 per child in 2015/16.
Another, which claimed for 50 minors was given £1.3m from the Government, but spends £2.1m
Three authorities predicted budget pressures in the region of £1.5m to £2m as a result of the increasing number of lone migrant children
And this is all against the backdrop of a national shortage of foster care payments.
The report said the burden of paying and looking after the children often falls on "port authorities" where the young people arrive in the country in the first instance.
The strain is so big in Kent children are now being moved to other areas of the country.
Cllr David Simmonds, Chairman of the Local Government Association's Asylum, Migration and Refugee Task Group, said the Government must commit to helping.
A child refugee smilingGETTY
Councils across the UK are demanding more funding from the government
He said: "This report highlights the significant financial commitment that councils make towards the care of these vulnerable children, with Home Office funding often covering only a small part of the overall cost.
"Many councils have been covering this shortfall over many years, and it is now imperative that councils get a long-term funding arrangement from Government so that the commitment to support those children starting a new life in the UK is properly funded for the whole time that these children are with us.
"Councils continue their strong track record of supporting child asylum seekers and over the summer, the number of children being cared for by councils rose to more than 4,600. 
“With the Calais camp closing and children arriving in the UK under the Dubs Amendment, this number will now be much higher.
“Every one of these children requires an individual package of care which includes council support from age assessment, a school place, to medical and social care. 
“A large number will have also experienced horrendous conditions, so councils will want to ensure they are able to settle into local communities as quickly and easily as possible with ongoing support made available as and when they need it."
Dave Hill, President of the ADCS, said it is the duty of Britain to care for the children as he heaped praise on the "truly commendable" response of local governments.
He said: “These children have experienced so much in their short lives; they have faced unimaginable trauma and danger and have truly beat the odds to be here. 
"They are extremely vulnerable and their needs are complex. But they, just like our own children, need and deserve love and support to help them overcome their experiences. 
“In recent days and weeks local authorities have accommodated hundreds of unaccompanied children and young people, first from Kent and more recently from Calais. 
“Every child and young person, irrespective of how they have arrived in this country, has a right to education or training to help them realise their ambitions."
Hundreds more children are expected to arrive in the coming weeks as French and British authorities clear out the Calais 'jungle' camp.
Children are being transferred to England if they have family here, or they are particularly vulnerable, under the Dubs Amendment to the Immigration Act and under Dublin III arrangements.

Jailed, the last of the four Asian brothers who were the most notorious abusers of teenage girls in Rotherham where 1,400 children were groomed

$
0
0
  • Brothers groomed teenage girls in Rotherham meting out horrific abuse
  • Three were jailed in April, the fourth was sentence today with seven others
  • The brother jailed today said: 'All white girls are good for is sex,' court told
Sageer Hussain (left) was the last of four brothers to be jailed for sexual abuse in Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Sageer Hussain (left) was the last of four brothers to be jailed for sexual abuse in Rotherham, South Yorkshire
The last of four brothers who orchestrated some of worst abuse of teenage girls in Rotherham has been jailed today.
Sageer Hussain was one of a gang of eight men sentenced to a total of 96 years in prison for 'degrading and violent' sexual offences against youngsters. 
It can be revealed for the first time today that he and his three brothers - Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras - were the most notorious perpetrators of terrible abuse against teenage girls in the South Yorkshire town.
His trial heard Sageer once proclaimed: 'All white girls are good for is sex and they are just sl*gs.'
Hussain was jailed for 19 years today after his brothers Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras were jailed in April.
The latest trial heard that one victim had gone to the police in 2003, saying she had been repeatedly raped by Sageer when she was 13.
She and her family told police, their MP and the then home secretary David Blunkett about the abuse and eventually moved to Spain to get away from the men.
Hussain's brothers (left to right) Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras were jailed earlier this year. The four brothers were the most notorious perpetrators in the Rotherham abuse cases
Hussain's brothers (left to right) Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras were jailed earlier this year. The four brothers were the most notorious perpetrators in the Rotherham abuse cases
Michelle Colborne QC, prosecuting, told the jury that the girl, now in her late 20s, and her family withdrew the allegations after receiving threats that their house would be burned down the family home and her mother would be raped.
But the court was also told that police lost the girl's clothes without carrying out any forensic analysis.
Tapes of Sageer's 2003 police interview were also apparently destroyed.
Files belonging to the youth support group Risky Business compiled at the time of her complaint were also lost as well as phones seized during the police probe. 
The family tried to get help from social services as well and took the girl out of school before eventually moving abroad.
Ms Colborne said the court case was about three victims 'who were sexualised and, in some instances, subjected to acts of a degrading and violent nature at the hands of these men'.
The victim the trial centred around was subjected forced to perform a sex act on five males as she was locked away in a flat.
She lost her virginity during the first savage attack by Hussain, in the same alleyway he used as the destination for other rape attempts.
Ishtiaq Khaliq was found guilty of one rape and three indecent assault
Naeem Rafiq (right) was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment.
Ishtiaq Khaliq (left) was found guilty of one rape and three indecent assault. Naeem Rafiq (right) was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment.
The prosecutor said Sageer played a 'key role' and was 'instrumental in befriending young girls who were flattered that he and his friends spent time with them'.
They were then exploited by Sageer, his friends and associates, seven of whom were sentenced today.
Mohammed Whied, 32, was jailed for five years after being found guilty of one count of aiding and abetting rape.
Ishtiaq Khaliq, 33, was sentenced to 17 years in prison after being convicted of one rape and three indecent assaults.
Waleed Ali, 34, was jailed for 13 years after being found guilty of one rape and one indecent assault. Asif Ali, 30, was given a 12-year term after being convicted of one rape.
Masoued Malik, 32, was jailed for 15 years after being found guilty of one rape, one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment.
Mohammed Whied (left), 32, was found guilty of one count of aiding and abetting rape, while Waleed Ali (right), 34, was found guilty of one rape and one indecent assault
Mohammed Whied (left), 32, was found guilty of one count of aiding and abetting rape, while Waleed Ali (right), 34, was found guilty of one rape and one indecent assault
Naeem Rafiq, 33, was sentenced to eight years after being convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment.
Basharat Hussain, 40, was convicted of one indecent assault. Hussain, who is currently serving a sentence at HMP Wakefield, was given an additional seven years to run alongside his current term. 
Judge Sarah Wright told the men: 'The victim of all eight of you was vulnerable - she was 13 and 14 years old.
'Although she had a loving and supportive family, and was doing well at school, she was susceptible to the attention that you and others gave her.
'She was targeted, sexualised and subjected to acts of degrading and violent nature.'
Adding: 'Each of the victims in this case were groomed, coerced and intimidated.'
Asif Ali (left), 30, was convicted of one rape. Masoued Malik (right), 32, was found guilty of one rape, one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment
Asif Ali (left), 30, was convicted of one rape. Masoued Malik (right), 32, was found guilty of one rape, one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment
Speaking about the impact on one of the victims, Judge Wright said: 'The childhood and adolescence of each of the victims can never be reclaimed - each has suffered severe psychological harm.
'They continue, and will continue to suffer considerable trauma throughout their lives.'
An official inquiry into exploitation in Rotherham in 2014 by Professor Alexis Jay concluded that at least 1,400 children had been raped, trafficked and attacked between 1997 and 2013 by gangs of largely Asian men, and that the victims were effectively ignored.
Speaking after the verdicts last month, Detective Chief Inspector Martin Tate said: 'The verdicts today are of massive importance to the young women who have come forward to report years of horrific sexual abuse at the hands of these criminals.
'They had to endure what no child should and have shown remarkable bravery throughout our inquiry.'
Director of Rotherham Children's Services Ian Thomas, Haley Fisher of Victim and Support Detective Chief Inspector Martin Tate outside court today
Director of Rotherham Children's Services Ian Thomas, Haley Fisher of Victim and Support Detective Chief Inspector Martin Tate outside court today
He said: 'I am so grateful to these women, many of whom remain incredibly vulnerable, for offering their support to our investigative team and I am so pleased that their voices have been heard and their abusers have been held to account for their vile crimes.'
Ringleader Arshid Hussain was jailed for 35 years in April by a judge who told him: 'The harm you have caused is of unimaginable proportions'.
In April, Basharat was jailed for 25 years and Bannaras 19 years following the first successful prosecution of a grooming gang in Rotherham since the child sexual exploitation scandal engulfed the town two years ago.

THE TOWN WHERE NOBODY LISTENED: SEX GANG'S CRIMES WERE IGNORED FOR YEARS BY THE AUTHORITIES

Sageer Hussain and his brothers Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras were the most notorious perpetrators of terrible abuse against teenage girls in Rotherham.
But everyone investigating the horrors inflicted on a generation of youngsters in the South Yorkshire town knows the offending of the Hussain brothers and their associates was just one part of a huge and sickening jigsaw.
Rotherham became a byword for the exploitation of teenage girls and the failure of police and social workers to stop it happening with the publication of the Jay Report in August 2014
Professor Alexis Jay's report shocked the nation partly due to the scale of exploitation it described, finding that at least 1,400 children had been raped, trafficked and groomed in the town over a 16-year period.
She found 'utterly appalling' examples of 'children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally-violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone'.
The report also laid bare the extend to which police and council officials failed to act on what they knew, and explicitly questioned whether this neglect was related to the perpetrators largely being adult men of a Pakistani heritage.
Although the Jay Report resulted in the Rotherham exploitation becoming a national scandal, it was the previous major prosecution of a grooming gang in the town that kick-started this process.
In 2010, five men - Umar Razaq, Razwan Razaq, Zafran Ramzan, Adil Hussain, Mohsin Khan - were found guilty of a string of sex offences against girls aged between 12 and 16.
This case provoked some media attention but did not gain nationwide coverage.
But it was followed by a growing number of prosecutions of a similar nature around the UK, including in Derby, Oxford and Rochdale.
The Times reporter Andrew Norfolk exposed a pattern of mainly white teenage girls being groomed by gangs of adult men of a Pakistani heritage.
When Mr Norfolk began to disclose in detail the stories of girls who had been exploited in Rotherham, it started a chain of events that led to Rotherham Council asking Professor Jay to look into what was happening.
Waves of criticism followed, aimed mainly at Rotherham Council and South Yorkshire Police.
Resignations included the leader and chief executive of the council as well as its director of children's services.

Shocking moment a 'cocky' thug, 28, inspects the blood on his hands after stabbing a tram passenger and then poses in a shop window

$
0
0
  • Osama Hussain knifed his male victim, 32, three times in the arm and back
  • Despite bleeding heavily, the victim managed to film Hussain on his phone
  • Separate CCTV footage shows thug admiring his bloody hands in a window
  • Hussain, 28, from Birmingham, was today jailed for nine years for GBH 
Posing in a shop window, this is the moment a thug admired the reflection of his blood-splatted hands after stabbing a tram passenger in an unprovoked daylight attack.

Osama Hussain, 28, knifed his 32-year-old victim three times in the arm and back - narrowly missing his spine - after he accidentally bumped into him on the tram. 

Despite bleeding heavily, the heroic victim managed to film Hussain on his mobile phone, recording footage which eventually led to his arrest.

Separate CCTV also captured Hussain swaggering away from the scene, hurling a drink can to the ground and admiring his blood-splattered hands. 

Thug caught on CCTV admiring his bloody hands after stabbing a man
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time0:14
Fullscreen
Need Text
this is the moment a thug admired the reflection of his blood-splatted hands after stabbing a tram passenger in an unprovoked daylight attack (pictured)
this is the moment a thug admired the reflection of his blood-splatted hands after stabbing a tram passenger in an unprovoked daylight attack (pictured)
Osama Hussain, 28, knifed his 32-year-old victim three times in the arm and back, narrowly missing his spine, in a shocking attack in July this year. His victim managed to capture him on his mobile phone (pictured)
His victim managed to film Hussain on his mobile phone (pictured) in footage which eventually led to his arrest
Osama Hussain (left and right), 28, knifed his 32-year-old victim three times in the arm and back, narrowly missing his spine, in a shocking attack in July this year. His victim managed to film Hussain on his mobile phone in footage which eventually led to his arrest 

Hussain is then seen stopping to admire his reflection in a shop window before calmly walking away from the scene in Birmingham. 

Today, Hussain was jailed for a total of nine years after admitting grievous bodily harm and possessing an offensive weapon.

Birmingham Crown Court heard Hussain displayed 'arrogant', 'cocky' and 'agitated' behaviour after getting on the tram on July 22.

He picked an argument with another passenger and became abusive towards the conductor when he was asked to turn his music down and stop drinking.

Today, Hussain (pictured) was jailed for a total of nine years after admitting grievous bodily harm and possessing an offensive weapon
Today, Hussain (pictured) was jailed for a total of nine years after admitting grievous bodily harm and possessing an offensive weapon
As Hussain got off the tram at Bilston, West Midlands, he turned his attentions to the victim who accidentally knocked into him while getting off.

Hussain launched a tirade of abuse and followed the man up the stairs.

There, he punched his victim in the head and body while holding a folding pocket knife.

The brave victim filmed Hussain on his mobile phone as he left the station. 

Following an appeal, he was arrested. 

Speaking after the case, Detective Constable Tim Friend, from British Transport Police, said: 'This was a completely unprovoked and callous attack which Hussain has offered no explanation for.

'This could have been a lot worse; if the stab wound on the back had been an inch to one side or had Hussain's fist, which concealed his knife, connected with the victim's head at a certain angle, the outcome would have been very different.'

But he said the incident had changed the victim's life

CCTV captured Hussain swaggering away from the scene in Birmingham in July (pictured)
CCTV captured Hussain swaggering away from the scene in Birmingham in July (pictured)
The thug was seen hurling a drink can to the ground and he sauntered along the street (pictured)
The thug was seen hurling a drink can to the ground and he sauntered along the street (pictured)

'This incident has left the victim with more than physical scars,' he added. 

'It has deeply affected his outlook on life and he now feels constantly on edge, is fearful of leaving the house and suffers flashbacks.

'While nothing can repair the harm Hussain did that day, we hope this lengthy sentence goes some way to helping the victim rebuild his life and I would like to commend his quick thinking which gave us the footage that allowed Hussain to be quickly identified.

'Knives cost lives and we will do everything we can to trace offenders and put them before the courts who, as this case shows, are willing to take people like Hussain off the streets for a considerable amount of time to make the West Midlands a safer place for all.'

Birmingham Crown Court heard Hussain displayed 'arrogant', 'cocky' and 'agitated' behaviour after getting on the tram on July 22. The CCTV footage is pictured above 
Birmingham Crown Court heard Hussain displayed 'arrogant', 'cocky' and 'agitated' behaviour after getting on the tram on July 22. The CCTV footage is pictured above 
The brave victim filmed Hussain on his mobile phone as he left the station. Following an appeal, he was arrested. Stills from the CCTV footage is shown above 
The brave victim filmed Hussain on his mobile phone as he left the station. Following an appeal, he was arrested. Stills from the CCTV footage is shown above 


Firearms officer who guarded Tony Blair and members of the Royal Family wins a £457,000 payout after senior officers branded him a 'P***' and a 'black c***'

$
0
0
  • PC Nadeem Saddique was discriminated while working at Cleveland Police
  • The firearms officer guarded Tony Blair and members of the Royal Family
  • Tribunal was told senior officers branded him a 'P***' and a 'black c***'
  • Mr Saddique has won a £457,000 payout over 'racial discrimination'
PC Nadeem Saddique, 45, has won a £457,000 payout after senior officers branded him a 'P***' and a 'black c***'
PC Nadeem Saddique, 45, has won a £457,000 payout after senior officers branded him a 'P***' and a 'black c***'
A firearms officer who guarded Tony Blair and members of the Royal Family has won a £457,000 payout after senior officers branded him a 'P***' and a 'black c***'.

PC Nadeem Saddique, 45, took his employer, Cleveland Police, to a tribunal, saying he was subjected to 'terrible bullying' and 'racial discrimination'.

It was told that senior officers wanted Mr Saddique, the only Asian in the unit, thrown out and that he was racially abused by those in his unit.

One colleague even had an English Defence League sticker, which made reference to Muslims and a crusade, on their holster, but this was not properly investigated.  

A remedy hearing in Middlesbrough ruled he should receive more than£457,000 for his ordeal which has left him unable to return to work. 

Speaking after the decision, he said: 'This has been a lengthy and extremely difficult process, which has taken a serious toll on my health and my family. 

'I never wanted it to go as far as a tribunal, but after experiencing problems with discrimination for a number of years within the force and exhausting all avenues internally without success, I had to do something.

'I hope the hearing this week will finally enable me to put the whole episode behind me.'
His lawyer, Clare Armstrong, from Slater and Gordon, said: 'This outcome reflects the seriousness of the offences and the impact it has had on Pc Saddique and his career.

'Pc Saddique was a dedicated police officer in the force but he was subjected to terrible treatment for years and his career derailed simply because of the colour of his skin.

'It is very clear that the force needs to take steps in order to give the public confidence this will not happen again.'

Mr Saddique, from Ingleby Barwick, Teesside, began an employment tribunal against the force in 2011, claiming race discrimination, harassment and bullying.

He settled with his employer without receiving any money, on the understanding that he would be given access to training and would regain his VIP protection status, which he felt he had lost unfairly, when he returned to work.

But since then a personal development plan had not been properly implemented, and his career stalled.

Cleveland Police said it has apologised and changes have been made.

A spokeswoman said: 'We have reviewed many of our policies as a result of this case and as part of our Everyone Matters project have delivered training sessions on equality, diversity and human rights and cultural awareness to the wider organisation.

'We are saddened that Mr Saddique is unable to progress his career as a police officer and wish him well for the future.

'The IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) investigation into the case is continuing, therefore it would be inappropriate to comment on this aspect of the case at this stage.' 

Police hunt man who GRABBED a terrified three-year-old girl in front of her family from Morrisons car park before dropping her and running off

$
0
0
  • The girl was in the supermarket in Blackburn at about 3pm yesterday
  • She was walking to the car park with her mother and five-year-old sister
  • An Asian man picked her up from a moving walkway and carried her off
  • Dropped her a short distance later and police say his motives are 'unclear'
A man who plucked a young girl from a moving walkway and carried her away from her family is being hunted by detectives.

The 'distressing' incident happened at Morrisons supermarket on Railway Road in Blackburn at about 3pm yesterday, Lancashire Police said.

The three-year-old girl was walking to the car park with her mother and five-year-old sister when she was picked up by a man, believed to be in his mid-thirties.

The toddler was walking to the supermarket car park with her mother and five-year-old sister when she was picked up by a man, believed to be in his mid-thirties. Police have released CCTV images (pictured) of a man they want to speak to
The toddler was walking to the supermarket car park with her mother and five-year-old sister when she was picked up by a man, believed to be in his mid-thirties. Police have released CCTV images (pictured) of a man they want to speak to
The man is described as between 5ft 6in and 5ft 8in, with black hair which was short at the sides and thick on top, and wearing blue jeans and a black and blue bomber jacket
Detective Inspector Tim McDermott, from Blackburn CID, said, 'the motive of the man remains unclear'
The man is described as between 5ft 6in and 5ft 8in, with black hair which was short at the sides and thick on top, and wearing blue jeans and a black and blue bomber jacket. Detective Inspector Tim McDermott, from Blackburn CID, said, 'the motive of the man remains unclear'

He carried her a short distance before putting her down, with police saying his motives remain 'unclear'.

He is described as between 5ft 6in and 5ft 8in, with black hair which was short at the sides and thick on top, wearing blue jeans and a black and blue bomber jacket.

Detective Inspector Tim McDermott, from Blackburn CID, said: 'This incident has understandably been very distressing for the family involved.

'The motive of the man remains unclear and so we need to speak to him urgently to understand what happened.
Viewing all 3867 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>